Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Hunting with Parkers

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 10-11-2013, 07:38 PM   #1
Member
George Lang
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 459
Thanks: 327
Thanked 335 Times in 179 Posts

Default

I have a pair of 8" high, size 10 wide, that I can no longer wear due to an ankle problem. There yours if you want them(or anyone else that can use them) just pay for the shipping. Dark brown tops. Bottoms and leather tops in good shape....George
George Lang is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-12-2013, 08:19 AM   #2
Member
charlie cleveland
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,806 Times in 3,970 Posts

Default

lastnight at football game i seen the ll bean logo on a van figure that..wonder if they give you a new one when it wears out...red wings makes a mighty good leather boot thats tough and water proof up to a point..i wore them for years for work and hunting... charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-13-2013, 04:14 PM   #3
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,932
Thanks: 1,773
Thanked 8,544 Times in 3,345 Posts

Default

OK, so we go to the near by Beans store. I figure I should try them on first. Of course the store doesn't carry anything remotely related to hunting. And that included the Maine Hunting Shoe. They did have the rubber bottom boots. So when the young lady come up to ask if she can help, I asked her what the difference is between a boot and a hunting shoe.

She doesn't know but points to the guy in the shoe department and says he will and she will get him to help me. She speaks to him and goes off to help others. The guy never does come anywhere near me, waiting on others as they arrive instead.

I was about to leave when some customer comes up to ask me about a product. I said you need to ask someone in a green shirt. He says - oh, I thought you worked here.

I say No, I have only been standing here long enough to work here. That at least got the attention of a green shirt walking by who went to get me some boots to try for fit.

Turns out a 12 is not a twelve unless you normally wear several (as in three or four) pairs of heavy socks. there was over an inch of toe room. It seems that with a single pair of heavy socks (i brought hunting socks with me to check the fit) I wear an 11 again (less than 1/2 inch toe room), first time since about 8th grade.

And a 12 inch tall boot is only considered 10 inches high if it is gore tex lined, however an unlined 10 inch boot is 10 inches high. I am getting dizzy.

By now the young lady notices I am still there and comes back to tell me the difference between a boot and shoe is the thickness of the sole and the shoe guy finally shows up and says the boot version came out in the 1970's because the shoes became fashionable and the sole wore on too quickly on pavement. He suggests the boot until I say want the shoe because much to their surprise, because I hunt and woodcock covers are wet.

It did get funny, because the guy who had come over to wait on me said he had property that had a lot of woodcock and they were always in the wet stuff. He likes to watch them flush, and we talked about the way they flew. Of course I asked if he allowed hunting and he said no. I said I had to ask and he laughed and said he understood.

so Maine Hunting shoes are ordered, we will have to see how they fit and how tall they really are once they get here.
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rick Losey For Your Post:
Unread 10-14-2013, 10:08 AM   #4
Member
Setter Man
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,798
Thanks: 1,710
Thanked 1,640 Times in 638 Posts

Default

Currently have three pair (including my dad's pair he purchased new in the early 50's). Here is my pair, purchased while on vacation in Maine in 1974. The ONLY boots I wore hunting for probably 30+ years. They have been patched and re-soled by Bean a few times. Now I wear them primarily for sentimental reasons as the just don't give me the ankle support that I need for long days in the grouse woods. They also make navigating "snotty" logs a little dangerous. Regardless, I'll probably go to my grave wearing them.

[IMG][/IMG]
Jay Gardner is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-14-2013, 02:49 PM   #5
Member
Kevin McCormack
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,247
Thanks: 1,721
Thanked 4,271 Times in 1,193 Posts

Default

Bought my first (and last) pair 50 years ago this month when I and some other friends were given permission to hunt pheasant on a series of farms on the MD-PA border. All of them involved slogging through wet bottoms that drained corn and other grain fields and ran for miles between the ridges. I learned some valuable lessons very early on: (1) the "non-slip chain tread" soles were as advertised ONLY on level ground (and virtually useless on any accumulation of mud or snow at whatever the incline); (2) the uninsulated version even with 2 pr. of wool hunting sox were cold as hell at anything below freezing temps; (3) they leaked water at the rubber bottom/leather top stitch lines regardless of what waterproofing treatment used over time (including melted paraffin).

When it came time to send them back in for new bottoms, I had the originals replaced with insulated Vibram tread soles with metal shanks; the improvements in toasty toes and support and traction were most dramatic, but over time the "split backstay" design played hob with the Achilles tendon on my right heel. I'd come home from 5 or 6 hours in the field with wet feet again (leaky seams) and the added aggravation of a sorely chafed heel and calf.

As the once incredibly abundant pheasant population on our choice little farmsteads began to succumb to overuse of pesticides, clean-farming, and a marked explosion in feral house cats (introduced by well-meaning yuppies moving out to the country from places like Pikesville, Glen Burnie and Baltimore), I began to spend more of my time grouse hunting in northwestern MD, PA, and NY. On a grouse hunting trip to NH in 1999, a friend of mine introduced me to Muck Boots, which at the time all the dairy farmers were buying up with a frenzy for wearing around the farmsteads in the winter.

I brought a pair back with me from that trip and have never worn anything but since then for light- to medium-duty bird hunting. They are warm as toast, completely waterproof, offer plenty of arch and ankle support, and are fitted at the ankle such that they won't ride off even in the mud. An added bonus is that you can 'fold' them down for ventilation or cleaning, something I don't think you can do with any leather boot, especially laceups. I'm working on my second pair and even bought a "shorty" version for use while working around the yard. For my money, there's nothing like them.

BTW - check out the very latest Shooting Sportsman mag (got mine 2 days ago). They have a very informative special evaluation section on the best of the so-called "pac" boots available for this season's hunting.
Kevin McCormack is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Kevin McCormack For Your Post:
Unread 10-14-2013, 03:12 PM   #6
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,479
Thanks: 6,727
Thanked 9,831 Times in 5,217 Posts

Default

After years of thinking that pull on rubber boots would slip off, and or cause blisters, I started wearing them when it was real wet. Now, like Kevin, that's all I wear for any outdoor use that requires more than shoes and less than waders. I have about five pair, haven't paid more than $25 for any of them. Some have room for extra socks, some don't. Some are insulated, some aren't. I still have Filson unlined Uplanders from when I was on the employee program, but can't seem to break them in wearing them about two days a year. I see they are up to $375 now. We paid flat rate eighty bucks for any boot as sellers of the product. They are a tough boot and waterproof, still made in USA.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-14-2013, 09:15 PM   #7
Member
charlie cleveland
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,806 Times in 3,970 Posts

Default

i too wear the muck boots..for years no more wet or cold feet for sure..but a lot of heavy briar patches will put a toll on them...easiet boot in the world to slip on or off.. charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-14-2013, 09:33 PM   #8
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,932
Thanks: 1,773
Thanked 8,544 Times in 3,345 Posts

Default

i have muck boots - great for winter and i wear them on cold days on a preserve, and even that rare deer hunt. But they are a bit clumsy for my covers and the tops would be shredded in no time.

looking forward to trying to Beans hunting shoes, It rained all night here and drizzled up to just before I turned the dogs lose today. I like the fit of my Goretex lined kangaroo boots, but my feet were wet in no time and I was never in mud or water any where near ankle deep.
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-14-2013, 11:02 PM   #9
Member
J. A. EARLY
PGCA Member
 
Jerry Harlow's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,102
Thanks: 4,550
Thanked 3,011 Times in 969 Posts

Default

Speaking of slip-on rubber boots, if you have a Tractor Suppy around you they sell Made In USA tall uninsulated brown rubber boots for less than $20. I wear them the entire turkey season in the spring and they have lasted several years per pair. As Bill said, if they fit, they do not rub up and down and I walk miles in them daily through wet fields and crossing creek after creek without wet feet.
Jerry Harlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-15-2013, 07:50 AM   #10
Member
Cold Spring
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,132
Thanks: 4,022
Thanked 7,132 Times in 1,382 Posts

Default

It must be just me and I know this is heresy to some, but the LL Bean hunting shoe/boot is the most uncomfortable boot I've ever worn. Oh they fit OK and are light as a feather, but are cold feeling as could be for typical small game hunting here in PA even with the insert thingy. I bought a pair years ago after reading all the hype, wore them and felt like my feet were freezing, bought the inserts, a little better but still uncomfortable. Maybe it's my circulation. But my Red Wing Irish Setters don't feel that way when hunting in the same conditions. JMO FWIW.
Frank Srebro is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.