![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
Sounds like anything but an original Parker BH.
__________________
"Training is like fighting a gorilla, you don't stop when you are tired, you stop when the gorilla is tired" |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Sorry, but you have to provide pictures to get a good opinion of what you are describing.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
If the “cut on the rib” is something that you can catch your thumbnail on and it’s quite visible I would suggest at the minimum that the barrels have been worked on and poorly refinished… that or possibly replacement barrels.
What’s the serial number? How about a pic of the markings on the barrel flats. .
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
The serial number is 152347. It appears that it was re-barreled with a Titanic steel D grade barrel, rather than an Acme Steel barrel. The same serial number is on the barrel but there is a 3 on the barrel flat. The asking price was $9K but I brought these issues to their attention and it is now priced at 5K. Is it possible that the barrels were originally Damascus and it was re-barreled with a Grade 3 barrel, or was it more likely cobbed together? Is it worth the asking price in your opinion? I haven't figured out how to send pics yet but am working on it.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#8 | ||||||
|
NIB. Those should have been fluid steel barrels (Acme) with that serial #, unless otherwise requested. Do all the serial numbers match?
__________________
If it were easy, everyone would do it. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
Also, if the seller dropped from $9K to $5k after issues were brought ta light, it tells you how much they have into it and can still make $$$$$. They DO NOT know what they are selling.
__________________
If it were easy, everyone would do it. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dean H Hanson For Your Post: |
|
|
#10 | ||||||
|
Yes all serial numbers are the same. I have given up trying to send pics as the website keeps telling me the attachments are invalid. Maybe someone can direct to me to the "attach pictures for dummies" area of the website. There is not a gap on the rib but it was obviously cut. BTW, the barrels "overload proved parker bros" stamps on the barrels. I always believed that this indicated much later date of manufacture than the 1910 manufacture date for this serial number. the receiver has 3 patent dates Jan 18 Aug 16 1887, May 7 Oct 8 1889 and Aug 15 1905. <BH>,152347 and a 5 on the opposite watertable. It is an ejector gun.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Mark Luitjen For Your Post: |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|