Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
FORCING CONES
Unread 06-10-2021, 09:28 AM   #1
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,598
Thanks: 3,327
Thanked 13,129 Times in 3,476 Posts

Default FORCING CONES

This is a subject that comes up quite often. The Forcing Cone is the tapered section of the barrel bore, immediately in front of the chamber, The larger diameter being the end of the chamber, and that point, where many of the questions originate, is the Chamber Length. The point of these questions is, invariably, so the shooter knows what the appropriate length shells can safely be used in the gun.

Because of the knowledgeable members, we accept that Parker Brothers bored their barrels to dimensions based upon the theory that a certain amount of the shell, upon opening when fired, extends into the forcing cone, in order to form a (better?) gas seal.

I have several questions, and hope to learn from knowledgeable people, and not just opinions, are the following;
A, Did Parker guns, made prior to the introduction of paper hulls, even have forcing cones?
B, Was the amount of opened hull withing the forcing cone, on an unaltered gun, always the same. To answer this, historical data most probably is necessary,i.e. factory records, or hang tags.

After the full acceptance of paper shells, a variety of lengths were available.
I have guns with 2 3/8" chambers, which I accept as fact, were intended for 2 1/2" shells. Likewise, I presume those of my guns with 2 5/8" chambers were intended for 2 3/4" shells.

Dean recently spoke of one of his guns with a 2 9/16" chamber, so my question was what shell was that gun intended to digest.

I have a hang tag (but not the gun) which states the gun was intended to shoot 2 5/8" shells (see the attached image) so what chamber length would that gun have been bored?

Are there any others out there, that lay awake at night thinking about this stuff, or are they all still trying to understand quantum physics and subatomic particles?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1955 (2).jpg (432.5 KB, 3 views)
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.