 |
|
 |
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the new PGCA Forum! As well, since it
is new - please read the following:
This is a new forum - so you must REGISTER to this Forum before posting;
If you are not a PGCA Member, we do not allow posts selling, offering or brokering firearms and/or parts; and
You MUST REGISTER your REAL FIRST and LAST NAME as your login name.
To register:
Click here..................
If you are registered to the forum and keep getting logged
out: Please
Click Here...
Welcome & enjoy!
To read the Posts, Messages & Threads in the PGCA Forum, you must be REGISTERED and LOGGED INTO your account! To Register, as a New User please see the Registration Link Above. If you are registered, but not Logged In, please Log in with your account Username and Password found on this page to the top right.
|
 |
|
 |
02-23-2011, 05:09 PM
|
#1
|
Member
|
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,905
Thanks: 11,203
Thanked 2,109 Times in 1,202 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Suponski
This is a great discussion. But just to interject a few thoughts here. These guns were machine made and hand finished. We know there were templates for drop points and such. Stocks were turned from blanks from a master etc.But they were hand finished guns and with that there has to be some "artistic license". Suppose the checkerer overran a couple of lines..change the pattern slightly..all fixed. Suppose a drop point chipped...fix it. Suppose the nose of the comb didn't come out quite right...make it a little different. These great craftsman were human after all and to think that errors were not made means we are putting these people on another plane. I would think that the final inspector would have the final say whether the gun went into the finished rack or went back for rework. After all we are talking about frugal Yankees here and these guns were not machine made 870's.
I'm not implying this is what happened but I thought it would be worth some thought.
|
I have to agree with you Dave and as we know Mr. Parker was about as frugal as they come. Eric
|
|
|
|
02-23-2011, 05:09 PM
|
#2
|
Member
|
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,704 Times in 2,676 Posts
|
|
Or how about this on CHE ( Ber) 136,503? Not your standard C stock checkering and comb nose but it numbers and letters. Except for the checkered cheeks, its correct for a D but not a C.
And the drop points are more rhomboidal than oblate. Guess I'd say more diamond than rounded.
|
|
|
|