![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
How about shooting 2 3/4 inch shells in a 20ga that has 2 1/2 chambers?@ #
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
i shoot 2 3/4 inch 20 ga shells in 3 of my 2 1/2 inch chambered parker guns with no problems...and please some of you go pattern your longer chambered guns and see if yall see any differance in your patterns..charlie
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
About thirty years ago I was shooting a lot of Doves with a 16-gauge 1928 vintage A.H. Fox Sterlingworth Ejector Field chambered 2 7/16 inch intended for 2 9/16 inch shells. I was using those wonderful compression formed 16-gauge 2 3/4 inch Winchester/Western Dove & Quail loads that the folks at Olin provided us for a few years. I didn't see any problems shooting those shells in the gun, but it really ironed the crimp memory out of those cases. When I shot them in my 1909 vintage Remington Arms Co. KE-Grade with full 2 9/16 inch chambers and more modern 2 3/4 inch chambered pumps and autos the crimp memory was great and to this day I get better reloads from the hulls shot in longer chambers then those originally shot in that Fox.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
Consider that the forcing cone accommodates an extra 1/8 to 1/4 inch of case material with no issues... |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
So I'm looking at a 1915 catalogue from the Edw. K. Tryon Company, the large, well known sporting goods distributor in Phila. On just one page there are (33) factory-loaded 12-gauge "high brass" 2-5/8" shells listed, with respected trade names like: Leader, Arrow, Ajax. The named shells were loaded by Winchester, U.M.C. and U.S Cartridge with Bulk and L&R dense smokeless powders.
Wow! There must have been many guns out there with 2-1/2" chambers intended for 2-5/8" shells ..... as per that 1/8" short convention we read about so often. ![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Srebro For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
If wooden dowel fits in between 2.86" to 3.1" then its redone to 2-3/4".
If forcing cone look elongated that may mean same, since a lot of time gunsmiths use elongating forcing cone reamers to do that. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
I would not trust a wooden dowel to measure chamber length. I would only use an instrument designed for the purpose and that would measure in thousandths of an inch.
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
I believe there'll be .005 tapper per inch, then when you hit the forcing cone there'll be a very fast tapper.
__________________
Paul Harm |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Paul Harm For Your Post: |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|