Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Engraving & Engravers

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 02-04-2015, 11:11 AM   #1
Member
Kensal Rise
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: 626
Thanked 2,590 Times in 929 Posts

Default

Depending on who made them, maybe they didn't "spoil" anything. If these are Parker efforts - or perhaps even test prototypes - they were possibly made up in the shop with bits on hand. Thus, no existing guns were sacrificed. Even if they were, it was a "cost of doing business" for Parker.

It will be interesting to see what the "letter" has to say...
John Campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-04-2015, 11:17 AM   #2
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 33,114
Thanks: 39,064
Thanked 36,219 Times in 13,262 Posts

Default

It would be interesting to see the date of the first of these conversions in comparison to the date of the first hammerless Parkers.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-04-2015, 03:13 PM   #3
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,616
Thanks: 3,339
Thanked 13,203 Times in 3,493 Posts

Default

John, By 'spoiled' I didn't mean so much as being rendered useless, as much as I meant it took a Swan, and turned it into an ugly duckling. This is just my opinion, as I have come to believe that the sculpted bolster Parker hammer gun is perhaps one of the most pleasing, to the eye, as any I have seem, and that is a lot of guns.
I fully appreciate that, as a prototype, or trial model, all aspects of a potential marketable gun had, as yet, been finalized. It would seem to me that had this example been of Parker's hand, and even if made from bits about the shop, a Parker safety would have been used, rather than, as Brian suggests, a Lefever safety.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
Unread 02-04-2015, 09:32 PM   #4
Member
Todd K.
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Todd Kaltenbach's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 105
Thanks: 912
Thanked 195 Times in 45 Posts

Default

I have to agree. To me a high grade hammer gun is the ultimate Parker. My first thought was why did they ruin that nice hammer gun? Still it is interesting.
Todd Kaltenbach is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Todd Kaltenbach For Your Post:
Unread 02-08-2015, 03:30 PM   #5
Member
JLoew
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,508
Thanks: 6,443
Thanked 6,645 Times in 880 Posts

Default

I spent a good deal of time with this gun and it is quite an interesting gun. The cocking rods are similar to a Lefever but not quite the same.
Josh Loewensteiner is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-26-2015, 11:42 AM   #6
Member
Kensal Rise
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: 626
Thanked 2,590 Times in 929 Posts

Default

Forgive me fellows. But I'm still wondering if anyone has proof that this gun/guns were actually made up at Parker's, and if so, is there any time frame that can be substantiated with documentation?

Or... did I miss something along the way?
John Campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-26-2015, 01:30 PM   #7
Member
C grade
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
David Dwyer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,390
Thanks: 4,135
Thanked 1,248 Times in 457 Posts

Default

Kieth
There is one of these guns in the hands of a collector in Seattle. He has read me the PGCA letter from Kirby that appears to authenticate the gun. I will post the letter when I receive it, hopefully shortly.
David
David Dwyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-26-2015, 11:07 PM   #8
Member
Phil C
PGCA Member
 
Phillip Carr's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,399
Thanks: 3,876
Thanked 6,583 Times in 1,578 Posts

Default

I have a hammerless LC Smith that was converted in a similar way. Bought it from the son of the last barrel maker, along with a a lot of other neat items. Gun is marked AP Curtis. I will try to take pictures tomorrow.
Phillip Carr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-09-2015, 09:55 AM   #9
Member
JLoew
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,508
Thanks: 6,443
Thanked 6,645 Times in 880 Posts

Default

Photos? Letters? We would love to see them.
Josh Loewensteiner is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-09-2015, 09:54 PM   #10
Member
Phil C
PGCA Member
 
Phillip Carr's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,399
Thanks: 3,876
Thanked 6,583 Times in 1,578 Posts

Default

Josh I pulled it out of the safe and took pictures. It is different then what I remembered, but unusual just the same. I am having computer issues and am having difficulty posting pictures. I can send you the pictures if you could post them.
Phillip Carr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.