![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
Tom, thanks. I'll try both sizes at some point. I might have to start reloading bismuth if my Parker starts to overtake my A5. I shot an awful a lot of ducks with an ounce of lead 6's back in the day.
Last edited by Dave Erickson; 06-10-2018 at 09:53 AM.. Reason: major goof |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dave Erickson For Your Post: |
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
You are dead duck on target with that comment. Number 6 lead shot worked awesome on decoying ducks in a 12 or 16 gauge.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Todd Poer For Your Post: |
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
The Nice shot did a much better job for me on ducks. 30" barrels choked f/f and killing ducks dead at 40 yrds all day. Bismuth is not as good IMHO. Really miss the Nice shot...nothing lasts forever.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
![]() ![]() I loaded up 3+ boxes of Nice Shot 5's roughly 10 years ago for a South Dakota trip. As rotten luck would have it that year, both of my older 16's when down with mechanical problems! I had thrown in a 12 gauge double at the last second and it ended up bailing me out on the trip. (At the time I felt foolish bringing a 3rd gun.) I still have most of these loads, and used up a small stash of Activ hulls to better differentiate the pricy Nice Shot loads. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Erickson For Your Post: |
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
Quote:
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to James Halvorson For Your Post: |
|
|
#8 | ||||||
|
Tom, I agree with you to the extent the shooter is using shot that is denser than steel (e.g., bismuth, tungsten composites, etc.).
-Victor |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Victor Wasylyna For Your Post: |
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
Yes, I don't use steel and none of my comments are relevant to steel shot sizes. That is a whole different issue that I don't have to think about, thank goodness.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tom Flanigan For Your Post: |
|
|
#10 | ||||||
|
I think it is almost now universally understood and discussed ad nausea that steel shot stinks for just about any use with firearms. It is just the less expensive non toxic alternative and that is its only attractive feature. Years ago crippled so many ducks using even #4 steel shot that it made me sick. Big fan of #6 shot that is lead mass or better equivalent for ducks. All I know is that just about anything is better than steel and would never shoot steel or anything harder than lead equivalent in any old gun. Actually can't think of any reason to really shoot steel at all. I know some of the shooting ranges are starting to push non toxic loads though.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|