Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Hunting with Parkers

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-09-2018, 02:48 PM   #1
Member
Tom Flanigan
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Tom Flanigan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 865
Thanks: 284
Thanked 1,254 Times in 425 Posts

Default

Here is a thought Dave. You might want to consider going with #6's instead of 5's in a 16 bore. You'll get greater pattern density and probably more even patterns. I have taken a ton of mallard's in Sasketechewan with the 6's to 40 yards. And the 6's are better if you are shooting smaller ducks. I have found that the 16 bores I have patterned shoot a bit better with the smaller pellet. In a 16 bore, I don't shoot smaller than #6. Just a thought....
Tom Flanigan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tom Flanigan For Your Post:
Unread 06-09-2018, 02:49 PM   #2
Member
Tom Flanigan
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Tom Flanigan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 865
Thanks: 284
Thanked 1,254 Times in 425 Posts

Default

Meant to say larger rather than smaller in my post above
Tom Flanigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-09-2018, 03:50 PM   #3
Member
Dave Erickson
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 73
Thanks: 58
Thanked 71 Times in 30 Posts

Default

Tom, thanks. I'll try both sizes at some point. I might have to start reloading bismuth if my Parker starts to overtake my A5. I shot an awful a lot of ducks with an ounce of lead 6's back in the day.

Last edited by Dave Erickson; 06-10-2018 at 09:53 AM.. Reason: major goof
Dave Erickson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dave Erickson For Your Post:
Unread 06-10-2018, 08:36 PM   #4
Member
Southpaw
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 653
Thanks: 634
Thanked 275 Times in 197 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Erickson View Post
Tom, thanks. I'll try both sizes at some point. I might have to start reloading bismuth if my Parker starts to overtake my A5. I shot an awful a lot of ducks with an ounce of lead 6's back in the day.
You are dead duck on target with that comment. Number 6 lead shot worked awesome on decoying ducks in a 12 or 16 gauge.
Todd Poer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Todd Poer For Your Post:
Unread 06-10-2018, 10:11 PM   #5
Member
Dunnigun
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 221
Thanks: 93
Thanked 153 Times in 46 Posts

Default

The Nice shot did a much better job for me on ducks. 30" barrels choked f/f and killing ducks dead at 40 yrds all day. Bismuth is not as good IMHO. Really miss the Nice shot...nothing lasts forever.
Brian Stucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-11-2018, 10:31 AM   #6
Member
Dave Erickson
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 73
Thanks: 58
Thanked 71 Times in 30 Posts

Default




I loaded up 3+ boxes of Nice Shot 5's roughly 10 years ago for a South Dakota trip. As rotten luck would have it that year, both of my older 16's when down with mechanical problems! I had thrown in a 12 gauge double at the last second and it ended up bailing me out on the trip. (At the time I felt foolish bringing a 3rd gun.)

I still have most of these loads, and used up a small stash of Activ hulls to better differentiate the pricy Nice Shot loads.
Dave Erickson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Erickson For Your Post:
Unread 09-09-2018, 04:47 PM   #7
Member
James Halvorson
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 40
Thanks: 19
Thanked 21 Times in 14 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Erickson View Post



I loaded up 3+ boxes of Nice Shot 5's roughly 10 years ago for a South Dakota trip. As rotten luck would have it that year, both of my older 16's when down with mechanical problems! I had thrown in a 12 gauge double at the last second and it ended up bailing me out on the trip. (At the time I felt foolish bringing a 3rd gun.)

I still have most of these loads, and used up a small stash of Activ hulls to better differentiate the pricy Nice Shot loads.
If I had three boxes like those on a shelf, I'd buy a 16. Nice stash!
James Halvorson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to James Halvorson For Your Post:
Unread 08-09-2018, 01:21 AM   #8
Member
Victor Wasylyna
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Victor Wasylyna's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 613
Thanks: 1,641
Thanked 1,724 Times in 372 Posts

Default

Tom, I agree with you to the extent the shooter is using shot that is denser than steel (e.g., bismuth, tungsten composites, etc.).

-Victor
Victor Wasylyna is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Victor Wasylyna For Your Post:
Unread 08-09-2018, 01:26 AM   #9
Member
Tom Flanigan
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Tom Flanigan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 865
Thanks: 284
Thanked 1,254 Times in 425 Posts

Default

Yes, I don't use steel and none of my comments are relevant to steel shot sizes. That is a whole different issue that I don't have to think about, thank goodness.
Tom Flanigan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tom Flanigan For Your Post:
Unread 08-09-2018, 10:04 AM   #10
Member
Southpaw
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 653
Thanks: 634
Thanked 275 Times in 197 Posts

Default

I think it is almost now universally understood and discussed ad nausea that steel shot stinks for just about any use with firearms. It is just the less expensive non toxic alternative and that is its only attractive feature. Years ago crippled so many ducks using even #4 steel shot that it made me sick. Big fan of #6 shot that is lead mass or better equivalent for ducks. All I know is that just about anything is better than steel and would never shoot steel or anything harder than lead equivalent in any old gun. Actually can't think of any reason to really shoot steel at all. I know some of the shooting ranges are starting to push non toxic loads though.
Todd Poer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.