Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-19-2015, 04:18 PM   #21
Member
C.O.B.
Forum Associate
 
Rich Anderson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,093
Thanks: 2,226
Thanked 6,389 Times in 2,094 Posts

Default

George I don't think I have ever posted pics of it. I might bring it to the Southern this year, it's been years since I shot it.
__________________
There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter...Earnest Hemingway
Rich Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-20-2015, 09:36 PM   #22
Member
wally vernon
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14
Thanks: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 6 Posts

Default

Here is a pic of mine. It is obviously too early for ejectors. My opinion is that it went back to the factory sometime after 1901. When the ejectors were added they even stamped the forend iron with the patent date. It is a 10 gauge DHE
wally vernon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to wally vernon For Your Post:
Unread 03-20-2015, 09:47 PM   #23
Member
George M. Purtill Member #28
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
George M. Purtill's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,345
Thanks: 2,040
Thanked 2,346 Times in 866 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wally vernon View Post
Here is a pic of mine. It is obviously too early for ejectors. My opinion is that it went back to the factory sometime after 1901. When the ejectors were added they even stamped the forend iron with the patent date. It is a 10 gauge DHE
Fabulous. I would say they didn't stamp the fore end iron with the date, they simply substituted a new ejector FE iron and stamped your SN on it. Very clean, neat and nice to have composite barrels with ejectors.
George M. Purtill is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to George M. Purtill For Your Post:
Unread 03-20-2015, 10:00 PM   #24
Member
wally vernon
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14
Thanks: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 6 Posts

Default

Yes, that is what I suspect also. it makes more sense. Also, If you look at the barrels, isn't it missing the screw that is supposed to hold the non ejector, extractors that would have been on the gun first? I know they could have welded in the hole, but why?
wally vernon is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-20-2015, 10:11 PM   #25
Member
George M. Purtill Member #28
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
George M. Purtill's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,345
Thanks: 2,040
Thanked 2,346 Times in 866 Posts

Default

Wally- do you have a letter on this gun?
George M. Purtill is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-20-2015, 10:27 PM   #26
Member
wally vernon
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14
Thanks: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 6 Posts

Default

No, I plan to get one. The seller said he had one but cant put his hands on it. He said the letter did not mention ejectors. Everything else checks out. I know the letters don't always (or even often) mention coming back for repairs/ modifications.
wally vernon is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-21-2015, 06:38 AM   #27
Member
George M. Purtill Member #28
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
George M. Purtill's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,345
Thanks: 2,040
Thanked 2,346 Times in 866 Posts

Default

Wally- let me give you the usual Dean Romig piece of advice. Join the PGCA. Get your letter at a huge discount and enjoy the benefits of membership.
Dean I am sure will fill in the rest of the blanks.
George M. Purtill is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to George M. Purtill For Your Post:
Unread 03-21-2015, 06:43 AM   #28
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,979
Thanks: 38,718
Thanked 35,952 Times in 13,175 Posts

Default

Those 'after the fact' repair records may well be in the missing order books.

I wonder if Parker Bros would have replaced the entire lug on these guns that went back for ejectors? I know it seems to us like a lot of work but it may have been easier for those folks to do it that way... after all, they had to replace the rib extension - why not go all the way?
Dean Romig is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-21-2015, 06:45 AM   #29
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,979
Thanks: 38,718
Thanked 35,952 Times in 13,175 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George M. Purtill View Post
Wally- let me give you the usual Dean Romig piece of advice. Join the PGCA. Get a letter and enjoy the many benefits of membership.

Dean I am sure will fill in the rest of the blanks.

George, I 'edited' your post a bit to reflect what I say these days.
Dean Romig is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-21-2015, 08:44 AM   #30
Member
wally vernon
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14
Thanks: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 6 Posts

Default

I was a member very early on and for many years. I just kind of let it lapse. I will re-join as I have rekindled my interest in Parkers.
wally vernon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to wally vernon For Your Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.