Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-16-2012, 09:21 PM   #1
Member
Double Lab
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Daryl Corona's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,050
Thanks: 18,489
Thanked 7,946 Times in 3,018 Posts

Default

Maybe someone of a much higher IT IQ can help you compress them.
Daryl Corona is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Daryl Corona For Your Post:
Unread 04-17-2012, 08:06 AM   #2
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,089
Thanks: 1,886
Thanked 5,500 Times in 1,533 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daryl Corona View Post
Maybe someone of a much higher IT IQ can help you compress them.
I have found a fairly simple method of posting pictures here and on other websites. I use a third party picture upload site, in my case photobucket. Once my picture is uploaded to photobucket I left click the "IMG code" (it will say "copied") below the picture and then right click here on the PGCA page when posting and "paste" the "IMG code" copied from photobucket. The IM code is nothing more than a web address (the URL) inside these commands [IMG]webaddressgoeshere[/IMG] When finished it looks like this on the PGCA page:



The e-mail link looks like this:

http://s269.photobucket.com/albums/j...raightgrip.jpg
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post:
Unread 04-16-2012, 09:22 PM   #3
Member
Holeshot
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 708
Thanks: 1,797
Thanked 269 Times in 159 Posts

Default

I personally don't like 3 inches of drop. I can get by with 2 3/4 but prefer 2 1/2 for hunting guns. 3 inches of drop is common on older guns, but if you look long enough you will find dims. you like. My feeling is the guy is telling you the truth. Dave
David Holes is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to David Holes For Your Post:
Unread 04-16-2012, 09:22 PM   #4
Member
Sam Hershfield
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 79
Thanks: 104
Thanked 35 Times in 7 Posts

Default

That would be great!
Sam Hershfield is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-16-2012, 09:24 PM   #5
Member
Bindlestiff
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Robin Lewis's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,118
Thanks: 703
Thanked 2,944 Times in 870 Posts

Default

If you want to resize the picture check this out...... Shows how to get a picture that is to large to upload resized so you can load.
Robin Lewis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Robin Lewis For Your Post:
Unread 04-17-2012, 05:46 AM   #6
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,089
Thanks: 1,886
Thanked 5,500 Times in 1,533 Posts

Default

Dimensions are an important criteria especially in a shooter grade (vs. collectable). Often we see guns for sale and the ad states "good" or "modern" dimensions, which is considered a plus. Seems shooters may have had a different style 100 years ago and many guns reflect that. The guns you mentioned have more drop than I like and when I see a gun with lots of drop it's factor in my decision. Sometimes it's too discouraging like the H&R 10ga grade 3, 2" by 3 1/4", I posted about the other day here, other times I factor in the $130-$150 more it will cost for a gunsmith to bend the stock (if it will move enough). Too much drop cause me to "float" my head on the stock to see the proper bead/rib picture, and that is not good and leads to more misses. Sometimes shooters compensate by attaching a neoprene or leather comb riser on the stock. in rare occasions the original stock is set aside and new one is custom built to the new owners specs (very pricey). Lots of drop affects value in the sense fewer people will be interested, it is a legitimate concern. The question is how much in terms of price.
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post:
Unread 04-17-2012, 08:11 AM   #7
Member
Hammer Gun
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Gary Carmichael Sr's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,698
Thanks: 2,852
Thanked 8,021 Times in 1,708 Posts

Default

Sam I have older guns that letter with 4 to 4-1/2 in of drop, back then it was what the buyer wanted to a certain extent, Parker would not do some things if there was danger involved to persons or the integrity of the gun!
Gary Carmichael Sr is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Gary Carmichael Sr For Your Post:
Unread 04-17-2012, 11:13 AM   #8
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,922
Thanks: 1,886
Thanked 8,983 Times in 2,625 Posts

Default

I posted these on the AHFCA web site sometime back, so had them available in photobucket --











I have a theory, that a lot of the guns that were built with what we consider "good dimensions" today, have been shot a lot, while these old guns with excessive drop kicked the original owners in the cheek so bad that they were shot very little, and remain for us today.
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post:
Unread 04-17-2012, 11:11 PM   #9
Member
AmarilloMike
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Mike Shepherd's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 563
Thanks: 1,158
Thanked 403 Times in 147 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Noreen View Post
I have a theory, that a lot of the guns that were built with what we consider "good dimensions" today, have been shot a lot, while these old guns with excessive drop kicked the original owners in the cheek so bad that they were shot very little, and remain for us today.
I feel unworthy to disagree with you as I hold you in awe in regard to all things to do with American doubles but for me the big drop Parkers don't bite my cheek at all. The comb touces my jaw right at the corner where my overworked jawbone goes from vertical to horizontal. I shoot a Parker with 3" of drop at a couple of thousand trap targets every year. It never bites my cheek and my flinch went completely away. I quit shooting competitive trap because of my flinch but I am thinking about going back at it with the big drop Parker. I also shoot a few hundred rounds a year through another 3'' dropped Parker at NSTRA field trials. Haven't noticed any kick from that gun at all. I like shooting Parkers with lots of drop.

Best,

Mike
Mike Shepherd is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mike Shepherd For Your Post:
Unread 04-17-2012, 10:56 PM   #10
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,096
Thanks: 534
Thanked 19,827 Times in 5,001 Posts

Default

1.5" and 2.5" fits be perfect as well. I think that is a fairly common dimension for a lot of people now a days. It seems like 3" drops were pretty common in Parker's day, especially early on.

Actually, the comb dimension is in some ways more important. Since you place your cheek closer to the comb. I have had shotguns with 1.5" and 3" drops feel pretty nice.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Reply

Tags
comb, drop, heel, stock

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.