![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||||||
|
![]()
It is very common to find inexact barrel lengths (e.g., 29 15/16; 25 7/8) on guns made before about 1920. For whatever reasons, after that they were usually very precise to the inch measurements.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||||||
|
![]()
I may be out on a limb here, but is it possible that the final regulation of barrels by manipulation of the muzzles resulted in this minor shorting on some pairs?
__________________
Bob Roberts |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | ||||||
|
![]()
I would doubt that.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | ||||||
|
![]()
I have two sets of Trojan barrels. One at 27 7/8" and one at 29 7/8" inches. Both from 1921. I guess considering their age a little shrinkage would be normal
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | ||||||
|
![]()
MY 12 Trojan (1929) 30" exactly. My 1921 set of bbls measures 27 15/16. Both are uncut. The 1921 set had an extension which was ground off and fitted to the 1929 receiver. Locks up tight.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|