![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
I think Tony Galazan had blank hanging tags for sale and if I recall correctly they were originals. You may dry fire a hammerless Parker but since hammer guns have firing pins you may want to consider using snap caps.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
FWIW, I have always been told that guns with a coil mainspring, such as Parkers, do not have to worry about the springs taking a set like some leaf spring actions, i.e. British sidelocks and LC Smiths.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
In about 1960 or so when my friend and I discovered his late grandfather’s Trojan in his family’s cellar tucked in behind the chimney, and in its original canvas case the hang tags were still with it but were so oil soaked and dilapidated and completely illegible, we just rossed them in the trash.
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
The PGCA doesn't have Hang Tags, we have Work Order Tags. Totally different tags. Work order tags were made after the gun was finished production and were not shipped with the gun. They gave build specifications. Hang Tags were filled out separately and were attached to the gun when shipped
Edited The more I think about the WOT's I think the tags were made at the office and the info from the Order Book was written on the WOT. The WOT was then taken to the factory and the gun built according to what the tag said. I doubt the Order books ever left the office building. They were constantly being used. Parts were picked, S/N established, then as each procedure was finished, entered into the stock book. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post: |
|
|
#7 | |||||||
|
Quote:
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
#8 | |||||||
|
Quote:
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
John, I would have to have the S/N of your gun. I can tell you that we started archiving research letters in 2004 and when searching for your name found none. Ron Kirby did the first letters but didn't archive them. Mark Conrad took over from Ron and did them for about 8 years, then I took over the letters in 2012. Mark started archiving in about 2004. The Order Books ended December 1919 so if there is Order Book information in your letter, it would have had to been made prior to 1920.
Give me your S/N. Chuck |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post: |
|
|
#10 | ||||||
|
Dean, I was all excited to dig into your question but when I looked at the WOT's, except for the real early ones which are real small and extremely dirty, most of the WOT's are in the range of 220k to 235k range, well after the order books ended in 1919. I did match up a bunch of them with the stock books but the stock books don't really give special instructions that the order book entry would. What I did find most interesting is that many of the WOT's showed a recoil pad where the stock books would never mention the butt treatment so the assumption would be that the gun had the standard butt for the grade of the gun. There are a lot of guns out there that we assumed they were retrofitted with a recoil pad when that was not the case. The large WOT's (there were 3 different sizes) many times would have interesting things written on the back side of the card. I've seen leather recoil pads, straight ribs, rounded recoil pad for a woman, etc. Real interesting reading. I think I'll start another thread with some pictures when I get time in my busy schedule
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post: |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|