Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-01-2018, 12:30 PM   #11
Member
Tom Flanigan
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Tom Flanigan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 865
Thanks: 284
Thanked 1,254 Times in 425 Posts

Default

I'm glad you asked Todd. The areas I hunt grouse, the same areas that my grandfather and also Dee Slocum hunted for the market in the 1800's, is very tight cover. Shots over 20 yards were rare back in the day and still are. The old overgrown apple orchards have dissappeared but the fox grape vines are still there along with a lot of bay berry bushes. Perfect grouse feed and cover.

Grouse are not tenacious birds and small shot brings them down. Small shot was used because of the thickness of the cover. You hope for some of the pellets to get through to the bird. You rarely get a clear shot. Thus small shot equaled more birds in the bag. It was that simple. And it worked.

Rare was the bird with a lot of shot in it, even using 10's. Dee sold for the market in NY city and birds with a lot of shot in them would never be bought. I used to pick my birds and my grandmother then washed them out in the sink. Many times she said to me "you must have scared that bird to death" noting the absence of shot. Very rare was the bird with more than three #9 pellets in the body and many is the bird I took with only one shot in the body.

I only use #9's on grouse and would use 10's if I could buy that size shot. I don't use them on quail preferring 8's so I have less shot in the bird.

I agree with your opinion for most birds but it doesn't hold for gunning grouse in thick coverts. I appreciate your response to my post.
Tom Flanigan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tom Flanigan For Your Post:
Unread 04-01-2018, 01:15 PM   #12
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 33,207
Thanks: 39,335
Thanked 36,398 Times in 13,319 Posts

Default

I have a book on Skeet autographed by Dick Shaughnessy.
Wasn't he or his father a MD?





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-01-2018, 03:15 PM   #13
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,722
Thanks: 6,895
Thanked 10,111 Times in 5,352 Posts

Default

???
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-01-2018, 06:33 PM   #14
Member
todd allen
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,228
Thanks: 2,240
Thanked 3,484 Times in 1,195 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Flanigan View Post
I'm glad you asked Todd. The areas I hunt grouse, the same areas that my grandfather and also Dee Slocum hunted for the market in the 1800's, is very tight cover. Shots over 20 yards were rare back in the day and still are. The old overgrown apple orchards have dissappeared but the fox grape vines are still there along with a lot of bay berry bushes. Perfect grouse feed and cover.

Grouse are not tenacious birds and small shot brings them down. Small shot was used because of the thickness of the cover. You hope for some of the pellets to get through to the bird. You rarely get a clear shot. Thus small shot equaled more birds in the bag. It was that simple. And it worked.

Rare was the bird with a lot of shot in it, even using 10's. Dee sold for the market in NY city and birds with a lot of shot in them would never be bought. I used to pick my birds and my grandmother then washed them out in the sink. Many times she said to me "you must have scared that bird to death" noting the absence of shot. Very rare was the bird with more than three #9 pellets in the body and many is the bird I took with only one shot in the body.

I only use #9's on grouse and would use 10's if I could buy that size shot. I don't use them on quail preferring 8's so I have less shot in the bird.

I agree with your opinion for most birds but it doesn't hold for gunning grouse in thick coverts. I appreciate your response to my post.
Thanks for the explanation, Tom. The vast majority of my bird hunting has been out West, with a little bit in the Northeast. I would agree that the Northeast grouse hunting is a whole lot different. What I've experienced, I would stay with the bigger shot myself, but I can't argue with what works for others. Wisdom has a way of transcending generations, and I won't argue with the wisdom of the old timers.
todd allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-01-2018, 07:45 PM   #15
Member
Tom Flanigan
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Tom Flanigan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 865
Thanks: 284
Thanked 1,254 Times in 425 Posts

Default

Todd, I’ve hunted huns and sharp tails extensively in Saskatchewan and used 6's for them because some of the shots were long. They didn't hold well for a point and very often would fly before I walked past my dog. My setter Stoney learned not to crowd them but many of the shots were long. I used to use 1 1/8 loads from a lightweight 12 bore DHE and was careful not to shoot over 40 yds. Sharp tail grouse are a much different bird than the ruffed variety. And hunting in the west is a far different ballgame than hunting eastern thick grouse coverts. But its all great.
Tom Flanigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-01-2018, 08:46 PM   #16
Member
todd allen
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,228
Thanks: 2,240
Thanked 3,484 Times in 1,195 Posts

Default

Most of my ruffled grouse has been on my friends mountain ranch in Southern Idaho. One ounce of 7s, through 5, and 15k chokes does the trick. When I hunted N. East grouse, the cover was definitely a lot denser, and the shot window a lot shorter. I was carrying an H & H Royal, 12 bore @ 6lbs 5 oz, with 30" bbl. Most of the hunt involved holding the gun vertical by the wrist, with my right hand, and moving saplings with my left. At the end of the day, I was wishing for lighter, and shorter. Maybe a 20 gauge Trojan, with bbls cut to 25". I don't know.
I have to take my hat off to you folks who hunt these types habitats on a regular basis.
todd allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-02-2018, 07:45 AM   #17
Member
Milt Fitterman
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 130
Thanks: 101
Thanked 150 Times in 60 Posts

Default

Welcome back Tom. Nice to hear from you again. Was your old hobby black and white barrel restoration?
Milt
Milt Fitterman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-02-2018, 12:21 PM   #18
Member
Harold Pickens
PGCA Member
 
Harold Lee Pickens's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,007
Thanks: 2,362
Thanked 9,112 Times in 2,287 Posts

Default

Todd, I dislike #9 shot for grouse, as it does put alot of bb's inthe meat. I shot #9 skeet loads thru my cyl/cyl VHE 20 one year, totally ruined alot of birds, and vowed never to use it again except on clays. I do like #7's as it does kill well. Grouse are not hard to kill, but I bet alot of lightly hit birds fly off without us realizing they are hit.
Tom, sounds like you have alot of good friends here happy to have you back--looking forward to more of your posts
__________________
"How kind it is that most of us will never know when we have fired our last shot"--Nash Buckingham
Harold Lee Pickens is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Harold Lee Pickens For Your Post:
Unread 04-02-2018, 01:04 PM   #19
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,722
Thanks: 6,895
Thanked 10,111 Times in 5,352 Posts

Default

Yeah, I'm glad Tom is back. As I recall, he is the only witness to my 45 yard kill on a quail with my Parker 28 gauge. Again, as I recall, I took a desperation shot on a bobwhite that was escaping behind a brush pile after we had emptied our guns at the other birds. The shot was a good 45 yards or more and both Tom and I agreed that we were through with that rise and we should continue hunting. However, just on a whim, I sent my Wirehair, Eva, on a long fetch toward the brush pile. We were both a bit astounded when Eva came out from behind the brush pile holding a dead bobwhite in her mouth. Tom was a very generous training partner when Eva was a pup, although she was a bit of a handful on a lead. He even brought birds out to the field for her. However, the day of the great shot, she was not on a lead and the birds were not planted. I sincerely hope that I am correct in identifying Tom as my partner that day. Jeff Mulliken would be the only other possibility and I don't remember ever carrying a gun when Jeff was my training companion.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-02-2018, 01:43 PM   #20
Member
Tom Flanigan
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Tom Flanigan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 865
Thanks: 284
Thanked 1,254 Times in 425 Posts

Default

I remember it well Bill. I also remember the time you or I shot a bird we thought we missed. We marked it down and Stoney went on point. We walked past him kicking the brush to no avail. You looked back at Stoney and spotted the bird almost under his nose laying belly up. We had a lot of fun. I was saddened to hear of Eva's passing.
Tom Flanigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.