Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions General Discussions about Other Fine Doubles

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 02-03-2018, 08:38 AM   #1
Member
Kensal Rise
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: 623
Thanked 2,589 Times in 929 Posts

Default

If the barrels of this gun are marked as you say: 11 & 12 bore, then I would suggest you measure the bores to see if they mic out to an actual 10-bore.

It is my admittedly remote suspicion that this gun may have been a 12 bore, rechambered to 10 bore -- with undersize 10 bores being the result of honing out 11 and 12 bore barrels to clean them up.

Just to be safe, the barrel wall thickness should also be checked. Especially if a 10-bore rechamber job cut cones out too far.

This is all speculation from a distance. If the gun shoots well, it's probably fine.
John Campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John Campbell For Your Post:
Unread 02-03-2018, 09:41 AM   #2
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,932
Thanks: 1,772
Thanked 8,544 Times in 3,345 Posts

Default

always safety first John

but i'm curious - i have a light unaltered 12 with the bores proofed at 13 - i have seen one marked 14-

if 12's can have tight bores- why not a 10- and would a 12 have originally had an oversized tube marked 11 in that day?

i think the weight also speaks to an original 10

but - having said that - i'd be measuring the walls ahead of the chambers very carefully -

long chambers were made as shown here

look about 1/2 way down in the second column from the left to the specs for Dr Willimson's new Lefever - a 12 ga with 3 1/4 chambers for a heavy load

http://library.la84.org/SportsLibrar.../SL2604014.pdf
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rick Losey For Your Post:
Unread 02-03-2018, 10:03 AM   #3
Member
Kensal Rise
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: 623
Thanked 2,589 Times in 929 Posts

Default

A bore mic should tell all. There's a good bit of difference between .775 and .729.

And... HOW he is measuring the chambers makes a difference. It should NOT be with a stick gauge like the Galazan. Professional tools are called for here. For chamber and cone!
John Campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John Campbell For Your Post:
Unread 02-03-2018, 12:44 PM   #4
Member
TxHuntermn
Forum Associate
 
Mark Ray's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,623
Thanks: 4,800
Thanked 2,319 Times in 755 Posts

Default

Will need to send the barrels out for a thorough check they are Birmingham proofed, BP prior to 1875, and possibly prior to 1868. Hard to overstate how massive they are, also, as shown below, there is large numeral 2 on the rib. Wonder if these are barrels for gun #2 or barrel set # 2 for this gun.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg E2039E32-AD03-4E9F-AB52-97A452EDC377.jpg (491.5 KB, 2 views)
__________________
" I love the look Hobbs, my Vizsla, gives me after my second miss in a row."
Mark Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-03-2018, 01:46 PM   #5
Member
TxHuntermn
Forum Associate
 
Mark Ray's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,623
Thanks: 4,800
Thanked 2,319 Times in 755 Posts

Default

I just looked at my light 12 bore Hemenway’s New Model hammer gun of the same vintage, and both barrels are marked as 14 bore. Also a pre ‘75 gun. That gun has 2 1/2” chambers.
__________________
" I love the look Hobbs, my Vizsla, gives me after my second miss in a row."
Mark Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-03-2018, 02:53 PM   #6
Member
Richard Flanders
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Richard Flanders's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,517
Thanks: 8,480
Thanked 5,544 Times in 1,719 Posts

Default

What a pretty gun! That is nice.
Richard Flanders is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Richard Flanders For Your Post:
Unread 02-03-2018, 03:30 PM   #7
Member
Jim DiSpagno
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,890
Thanks: 5
Thanked 2,750 Times in 808 Posts

Default

Kirk Merrington in Kerrville Texas is the man for the job. British trained and a barrel specialist. A complete gentleman to deal with and knows British guns inside and out.
Jim DiSpagno is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jim DiSpagno For Your Post:
Unread 02-04-2018, 09:22 AM   #8
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,050
Thanks: 529
Thanked 19,655 Times in 4,963 Posts

Default

These are the type of guns that usually when encountered are in sad overall condition. It is great to see an example that has survived to remain as nice at it is.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.