Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-27-2010, 12:57 PM   #11
Member
Richard Flanders
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Richard Flanders's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,517
Thanks: 8,480
Thanked 5,545 Times in 1,719 Posts

Default

Go for it Larry! Use the old stuff and make sure to inhale the sweet intoxicating odor of the shell after the shot and post pics afterwards. Those 4 and 5 shells should do the trick at a reasonable range. I have stacks of old 20ga Super X and Remington paper 20's on the shelves and love to shoot them. This wily old Montana rooster fell to an old Remington 20ga shell and was a shot that Trigg and I will never forget. Trigg said it was like watching a movie unfold as he watched from a distance as his dog Dodger and I slowly tracked this bird and finally got it to fly from cover.

As an aside, has anyone seen the new Remington 3" 20ga shells of 1.5oz tungsten that is heavier than lead and patterns incredibly tight. The wad is a solid tube that pulls away from the rear of the shot column in flight using a parachute like concept. Very interesting. Can be seen in the latest American Hunter.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg My paper shell bird mail.jpg (150.8 KB, 7 views)
Richard Flanders is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Richard Flanders For Your Post:
Unread 09-25-2021, 06:53 PM   #12
Member
10 bore
PGCA Member
 
scott kittredge's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,969
Thanks: 7,906
Thanked 2,668 Times in 862 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Lester View Post
From Scott Kittredge:

"This pattern was shot with an old REM-UMC SHURSHOT paper 12 ga 3 drms 1oz #4, 132 pellets to an oz. This shell is about 40 to 50 years old. I shot it out of a 12 ga CHE acme barrels choked .022 at 40 yds rest shot. 115 out of 132 = 87%. So do the new shells shoot tighter or are the old ones just as good?"



I bought this back to the top. I shot this pattern 11 years ago with an old factory shell. I did another test soon after to see if it would do the same and it did.
Scott
__________________
No man laid on his death bed and said,"I wished I would have worked more"
scott kittredge is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to scott kittredge For Your Post:
Unread 09-25-2021, 07:17 PM   #13
Member
Richard Flanders
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Richard Flanders's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,517
Thanks: 8,480
Thanked 5,545 Times in 1,719 Posts

Default

Who needs a pattern any tighter than that out of a .022" choke???? A pigeon could barely survive that pattern.
Richard Flanders is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Richard Flanders For Your Post:
Unread 09-25-2021, 08:19 PM   #14
Member
Stan Hillis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,131
Thanks: 4,214
Thanked 5,127 Times in 1,449 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Flanders View Post
Who needs a pattern any tighter than that out of a .022" choke???? A pigeon could barely survive that pattern.
A turkey hunter, maybe?
Stan Hillis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-25-2021, 10:08 PM   #15
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,934
Thanks: 1,890
Thanked 9,047 Times in 2,635 Posts

Default

Back in 1963 when I got my 12-gauge, 3-inch, Super-Fox, it came with three boxes of late 1930s Remington ARROW EXPRESS Magnum Loads. One each #4, #5 and #6. None of the boxes were quite full, a few shells out of each. When I was cleaning out my Father's house in 2003 after I retired I found the pattern sheets I'd shot back then were still there in the basement, rolled up and tucked up in the main floor joists. They showed 79% with the #4s and 85% with the #5s. Also the #6 box with 14 shells was there in the basement too.

ARROW EXPRESS 12-gauge 3-inch Magnum Load.jpeg

Guess I shot the #4 and #5 shells at Columbia Basin Mallards back in the 60s.

I didn't realize at 17 that my 1928 vintage gun was actually made for 1 3/8 ounce loads. I even tried some of the 1 7/8 ounce loads in it, but they made very patchy patterns so I stuck with 1 5/8 ounce loads until bismuth came along.
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post:
Unread 09-26-2021, 06:16 PM   #16
Member
charlie cleveland
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,809 Times in 3,972 Posts

Default

I too have some of those old 1 3/8 ounce loads and the 1 5/8 ounce loads these loads were top performers in their day...I ve shot hundreds of the old 1 5/8 ounce loads but the 1 3/8 ounce loads were before my time...now the 1 7/8 and the 2 ounce loads were my favorite loads for turkey for several years till the 3 1/2 inch shell in 12 ga came along...I ve used this shell up to this past year when the new tss no9s in the 3 1/2 inch shell came along with 2 1/2 ounce of shot..this is the best turkey shell ever fired....I still like the old paper and plastic shells.....charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.