![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
I misread the original post and thought the gun was being offered for $3000, hence my comment. I paid half again as much for my last 32" V Grade 16. In pretty nice condition, it sold in about eight minutes, on this site.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Jay Gardner For Your Post: |
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
That they are!
__________________
Wag more- Bark less. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Daryl Corona For Your Post: |
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
And a 16/32, 1-Frame would be identical in size and overall appearance. A 16/32 would be a fantastic gun especily with a straight stock.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
The 0 frame 16 is way overrated. The #1 frame is a better frame for most people in terms of fit and balance.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to greg conomos For Your Post: |
|
|
#8 | |||||||
|
Quote:
My O frame 20's and 16's are much better suited to bird hunting as they are lighter and easier to carry all day. Now the 00 frame is another story. Just my opinion-mileage may vary.
__________________
Wag more- Bark less. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Daryl Corona For Your Post: |
|
|
#9 | |||||||
|
Quote:
In any case, I'm really referring more to the 'ergonomics' of the gun. A 0 frame can be a bit dainty at times for the average grown male. IMO. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
#10 | ||||||
|
I have 0 frame and 1 frame 16 gauges with 26" and 28" barrels that weigh 6 1/4 pounds.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|