![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||||||
|
![]()
I think the 10's are a hoot to shoot, and given two Parker's in identical condition, I would pay a premium for the 10 gauge. I may not use them as often as a 12,16 or 20 gauge but reloading for the 10 gauge is not all that difficult, and it's a great winter diversion from shoveling snow off the roof. Heck, if you roll crimp, and use the same gun, you don't even need a reloading press. I would agree that the short ten's sell to a limited number of shooters/collectors, but to those that enjoy them, value should go hand in hand with the numbers produced, and perhaps more importantly, the numbers that have survived in shootable condition.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||||||
|
![]()
10's a big fun but not for everyone. They have become much more popular thanks to Sherman Bell/DGJ and RST 10ga 2 7/8" ammo.
Gun for gun and condition for condition I would say they do sell for a little less than 12's. That being said if two Parkers were sitting on a dealers table priced the same and equal in condition and rarity, I would take the 10 every time. But my interests in collecting are skewed towards BIG GUNS form the golden age of waterfowl hunting. As others have pointed out finding a high condition 10 is extremely difficult given that waterfowl seasons and limits were non existent during the hay day of the 10 gauge-----these guns were used spring and fall when waterfowl blacked the sky. That is the appeal to me of owning the used but not abused examples. They may not have high condition but tons of character and history. Good luck with the D 10. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Craig Larter For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | ||||||
|
![]()
Who are going to be looking for condition AND FIT. If I see a high condition 10ga at a good price by any maker and it has 2" DAC by 3 1/2" DAH at the heel I am going to pass. Not only are the hammerless 10's far fewer in number they were all made in the period of lots of drop. These days a good condition unmessed with 10 with good dimensions stands on it's own merits and will command a price close to or equal to a similiar 12. The era of NH and EH GRADE guns in such condition languishing on the dealers rack at a bargain basement price are gone.
__________________
Progress is the mortal enemy of the Outdoorsman. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
Agree 100 %, reason I strayed from Parkers for a Hammerless short 10 is way the gun fit. Ithaca Super 10 I bought a few months ago has a much higher stock than my Hammer Parker 10 about 2 3/4 DAH. . It's probably 40 years newer which accounts for the more modern dim's William |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | ||||||
|
![]()
Gentlemen, I first of all want to apologize. For the first three responses, I received email notification, but not for subsequent replies. Therefore, I didn't check my post for a day or so. The gun is across country, so I've gathered info as best I can. It's a DH, s/n 57024, made in 1889 on a 2 frame. It has 30" damascus barrels that appear to be uncut(last 1/8" or so of rib smooth and proper keels). The biggest potential for a problem that I see, other than paying for it without my wife finding out, is that both barrels measure cylinder. That just doesn't sound right to me, but I guess it's possibly original. Once again, I appreciate any info any of you can share.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | ||||||
|
![]()
If that cylinder choke is being measured with a plug gauge, that is not an issue.
The bores of an 1889 vintage Parker Bros. 10-gauge are very likely to be much closer to .800" than .775". What are actual measurements with a bore micrometer? |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | ||||||
|
![]()
#57024 does show as 30" barrels in the book
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Rick Losey For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | ||||||
|
![]()
The choke was measured with a flat Galazan gauge. This is probably the only measurement that I'll be able to get. So if I understand correctly, the choke is relative to the actual bore. If the bore is "oversize", the muzzle could measure larger than a more conventional muzzle and still have the constricting properties?
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|