|
| Notices |
Welcome to the new PGCA Forum! As well, since it
is new - please read the following:
This is a new forum - so you must REGISTER to this Forum before posting;
If you are not a PGCA Member, we do not allow posts selling, offering or brokering firearms and/or parts; and
You MUST REGISTER your REAL FIRST and LAST NAME as your login name.
To register:
Click here..................
If you are registered to the forum and keep getting logged
out: Please
Click Here...
Welcome & enjoy!
To read the Posts, Messages & Threads in the PGCA Forum, you must be REGISTERED and LOGGED INTO your account! To Register, as a New User please see the Registration Link Above. If you are registered, but not Logged In, please Log in with your account Username and Password found on this page to the top right.
|
 |
|
 |
10-30-2012, 04:45 PM
|
#1
|
Member
|
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,709 Times in 2,677 Posts
|
|
Historically, people with money and desire to acquire the best Parkers have sought high condition guns, high condition being defined as what a Parker looked like when new. Most restorations fall short and value has been reduced. I can privately point to specific situations where that has occured. When the restoration has been so exact and true to Parker standards at the time the gun was made, I have personally seen increases in value, and I mentioned several above. There are more, but it requires a level of skill that most restorers lack and for most restorations, the restoration is obvious, which has historically reduced value.
By the way, the Czar's gun, at $265,000 the highest selling Parker in history, was publicly disclosed to have a replaced stock. Value destroyed?
How you or I feel about it doesn't matter. If you want a sweat stained gun, the history in the market is that stains and significant use indications reduce value. Just watch the market and keep track of good guns for a number of years, I think you might reach the same conclusions. What you see here in this forum is only a small part of the Parker collecting community and I suggest to you that the top players who pay large sums do not hang on this forum.
|
|
|
|
10-30-2012, 10:33 PM
|
#2
|
Member
|
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,801
Thanks: 3,477
Thanked 13,924 Times in 3,648 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Day
What you see here in this forum is only a small part of the Parker collecting community and I suggest to you that the top players who pay large sums do not hang on this forum.
|
What I see here, as opposed to what you "suggest", is a pretty nice cross section of the "Parker collecting community". I'm at a loss as to how you suppose to know the net worth of those who 'hang' here, what kind of players we represent, or what we choose to collect. I had dinner last Friday night with a wonderful bunch of guys, many of whom are, to use your term, top players. No one amongst that group at the annual meeting, or at the shooting grounds, exhibited any distinction in their appreciation for the guns we all brought to show or shoot. The man who sits on one hundred ones, sits no lower than the man who sits on one hundred one hundreds.
|
|
|
|
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
|
Bill Murphy, Buddy Marson, Daryl Corona, Dave Purnell, David Lien, Dean Romig, George Lander, Larry Mason, Mark Landskov, Patrick Lien, Paul Plager, Rich Anderson, Richard Flanders, Russ Jackson, Stephen Hodges, Steve Huffman, Thomas L. Benson Sr. |
|