Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-28-2012, 09:24 AM   #1
Member
charlie cleveland
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,809 Times in 3,972 Posts

Default

looks like all the powder loads were fairly close in peak preasure.... charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2012, 10:47 AM   #2
Member
Joe Wood
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 164
Thanks: 146
Thanked 153 Times in 53 Posts

Default

Jay, thanks a lot for your input--you clearly stated what I'd feebly tried to say earlier in this thread.

I always carry a wall thickness gauge with me and it has saved my butt several times. One very nice gun offered by a well known dealer and having no visible defects gauged .010! That was a close call! I too am amazed how few dealers have gauges capable of measuring the whole length of the barrel. Do they prefer not to know? Caveat emptor!
Joe Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2012, 01:04 PM   #3
Member
J. A. EARLY
PGCA Member
 
Jerry Harlow's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,130
Thanks: 4,645
Thanked 3,053 Times in 985 Posts

Default

"This is almost always in a 3-4" area very close to the top rib or bottom rib, and only on one side of the tube. As one person on this thread mentioned, virtually all vintage American doubles have a very noticeable lack of concentricity, ie thicker on one side than the other. There is also the matter of soldering on the ribs, with the required filing of overflow solder tight in to the rib, creating these thin spots."

Jay,

Thanks for the above reply. On almost every set of barrels, this is where I do find the thinnest spots. I had never understood why as one would think this area would not have been the one to meet the file as much as the outermost metal. The tendency is to measure the outside three-fourths of the barrel away from the ribs for thickness and to ignore the one remaining fourth of the barrels for measurement next to the ribs. Now I know why that is where they are the thinnest there. I see it on top more than on the bottom, with lots of low .020 measurements on smaller framed guns.
Jerry Harlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2012, 04:06 PM   #4
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,291
Thanks: 379
Thanked 4,337 Times in 1,406 Posts

Default

Possibly 'splaining this. No infro on the load

Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Old 08-28-2012, 06:13 PM   #5
Member
Bindlestiff
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Robin Lewis's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,118
Thanks: 703
Thanked 2,946 Times in 870 Posts

Default

John,

I was recently told that the TIG process was discontinued and the only liners they are doing now will reduce the gauge size; similar to what others have been doing for years. I have not checked with them directly but the person that told me is very knowledgeable about such things.
Robin Lewis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Robin Lewis For Your Post:
Old 08-28-2012, 06:27 PM   #6
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,935 Times in 795 Posts

Default

John,

Leave the barrels as they are. Chances are that was how they came from the factory. They are plenty safe for everything except using them to strike rocks!

Just shoot it or sell it. There is nothing wrong with the gun except that it is a lightweight.

Mark
__________________
Don't hunt with a gun that will embarrass your dog!

USMC Retired
USMC Distinguished Marksman
USMC Distinguished Pistol Shot
NRA Benefactor - Ring of Freedom member
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mark Ouellette For Your Post:
Old 08-28-2012, 06:31 PM   #7
Member
winplumber
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,704
Thanks: 1,925
Thanked 675 Times in 424 Posts

Default

So John do you still own the 20ga ?
Steve Huffman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Steve Huffman For Your Post:
Old 08-28-2012, 07:33 PM   #8
Member
Joe Wood
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 164
Thanks: 146
Thanked 153 Times in 53 Posts

Default

I suggest you keep it as is and disclose the thin walls to any potential buyer (which you already have). That is one beautiful gun! My goodness, how many rounds has it digested in its long life that were probably a heck of a lot hotter than what you've been feeding it.

Remember, WW Greener once had one of his barrels thinned to .010 near the muzzle and then shot proof loads through it with no ill effect. Then he used a pen knife to slit the tubes to show bystanders.
Joe Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Joe Wood For Your Post:
Old 08-28-2012, 07:44 PM   #9
Member
John D.
PGCA Lifer
Admin

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,454
Thanks: 2,343
Thanked 4,365 Times in 843 Posts

Default

Yes, I still own her. I would NEVER sell something to someone without sharing all I knew. I am so thankful that the prospective buyer asked that I take the barrel dimensions and measurements. I should have done that when I first got her, but I didn't. Its simply a righteous little DH.

So, thanks guys.... I have an aversion to sleeving - especially is it drops her down a bore size. So, I will probably update that "for sale" thread given what I found out - and repost it at a lower price, or - more realistically - just keep her in my safe and shoot it on special occassions with my RST low pressure loads or removible gauge tubes?

My thanks again... Now you know why this thread has been of incredible interest to me....

John
John Dunkle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2012, 07:57 PM   #10
Member
winplumber
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,704
Thanks: 1,925
Thanked 675 Times in 424 Posts

Default

So what some are kinda saying is some Parkers with Damascus barrels let the factory with 019 thickness we say is unsafe they say was ? Damascus gota Love it. NEVER MIND THIS I WENT BACK AND DID JOHNS MATH !
Steve Huffman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.