Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-04-2012, 03:03 PM   #1
Member
George Lander
Forum Associate
 
George Lander's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,291
Thanks: 2,852
Thanked 731 Times in 379 Posts

Default

Destry: I think that he is referring to "flock shooting" which, of course, is illegal in this country now.

Best Regards, George
George Lander is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-04-2012, 03:12 PM   #2
Member
MarketHunter
PGCA Member
 
Destry L. Hoffard's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,383
Thanks: 654
Thanked 4,560 Times in 1,269 Posts

Default

If that's the meaning of the phrase, it's far far far off base. The factory load for a 10 gauge in the days this gun was made would have been 1 1/4 ounce. That's a modern 12 gauge heavy field load today which is certainly not a "flocker" type load.

Even with a magnum 10 gauge shooting 2 to 2 1/4 ounce loads they wouldn't be much of a "flocker". I've been shooting one since I was in high school and can remember very very few occasions when more than one bird was taken at a shot.

Just because a gun is old and heavy with a larger than 12 gauge bore doesn't mean it's purpose was to devastate "flocks" of waterfowl. They were long range guns meant for heavy powder charges, the weight of the gun kept down the recoil.


D
__________________
I was as virtuously given as a gentleman need to be; virtuous enough; swore little; diced not above seven times a week; went to a bawdy-house once in a quarter--of an hour; paid money that I borrowed, three of four times; lived well and in good compass: and now I live out of all order, out of all compass. Falstaff - Henry IV
Destry L. Hoffard is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Destry L. Hoffard For Your Post:
Unread 06-04-2012, 03:34 PM   #3
Member
George Lander
Forum Associate
 
George Lander's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,291
Thanks: 2,852
Thanked 731 Times in 379 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Destry L. Hoffard View Post
If that's the meaning of the phrase, it's far far far off base. The factory load for a 10 gauge in the days this gun was made would have been 1 1/4 ounce. That's a modern 12 gauge heavy field load today which is certainly not a "flocker" type load.

Even with a magnum 10 gauge shooting 2 to 2 1/4 ounce loads they wouldn't be much of a "flocker". I've been shooting one since I was in high school and can remember very very few occasions when more than one bird was taken at a shot.

Just because a gun is old and heavy with a larger than 12 gauge bore doesn't mean it's purpose was to devastate "flocks" of waterfowl. They were long range guns meant for heavy powder charges, the weight of the gun kept down the recoil.


D
Destry: I totally agree, but I think that's what he was referring to when he used the word "flocking"

Best Regards, George
George Lander is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-04-2012, 04:08 PM   #4
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,094
Thanks: 7,104
Thanked 10,601 Times in 5,564 Posts

Default

Destry, the first time I picked up my #6 frame ten, I made a comment to the owner. "This is a heavy flocker." He replied, "Yup, it's one flockin' hard shooter too."
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.