Parker repros vs. Parker originals

[ed good]

mills: the best way to address your question is with another example of repro vs orginial.

i am talking about vintage cars vs repros. they look similar, but they are not the same. if you have never driven the original, then a repro is just fine. however, once you drive the real thing, then you think less of your repro.

it is the same thing with parker shotguns.

[Chris T.]

The fit of the parts on the repro's is excellent they're definately well made, but the craftsmanship that goes into an original Parker is lost in translation. Having both in hand, there is no comparison between the feel of an original and a repro, the weigh and ballance are superior in an original.

[Chuck Heald]

I would argue that Mr Skeuse ensured the weight and balance was replicated to the examples of the originals he chose.

The "feel" a gun has is part physical, part mental. How much of each is in the mind of the beholder.

That's the part about these reproductions being relatively new and not an American made gun. They'll never command the awe, in our generations, that the originals will.

[Double Lab]

As one who has never owned or shot a repro., I've held them and I agree with Chris. There's something lacking and I can't put my finger on it but for lack of a better term I'll just call it "soul" or maybe character. I think they are great guns but not for me. My question is about the reference to "better steel". In what way is the repro steel better than an original? My 100yr. old steel does pretty well on it's own. Just wondering.

[Chuck Heald]

Daryl,
I agree. No soul. They are essentially new guns. But I like new guns too. I put them in a category with the newer Superposed guns. American design, foreign built.

As for soul, it will come from my hunting of the gun or it will go down the road.

[Chris T.]

Don't get me wrong, I have had a few reproductions and I think they are great guns. I'm sure they did their best to replicate the originals but the barrels on the repro are much heavier. I'm sure this is a function of safety, you won't find a repro with .020-.025" (or less) barrel walls, there are only so many ways to get weight off of the front of a gun. It's difficult to describe but trust me, if you can have one of each in hand you'll see the difference.

[Chris T.]

Daryl,
Your last post made me think about Cabela's, every time I go there they try to sell me a Benelli something or other. They always say they are superior because of the cryogenic tempering, the bores won't scratch or pitt etc. I always laugh to myself, my 1909 DHE has mint bores.

[Wild Skies]

I feel real bad for some of youse guys whose Repros don't have any soul---mine do, all of 'em have it...a couple of 'em have it real bad.

I also have an original 12-ga. Parker Bros. DH damascus that they tell me has a lot of soul, too. I haven't found it yet, but I suppose it's there somewhere. Given the opportunity, I would jump at the chance to trade it even-up for any 28-ga. Repro.

[Big D]

Aren't Repro's stocked with Claro? Isn't it less dense than American Walnut?

[Chuck Heald]

Originally Posted by John Dallas

Aren't Repro's stocked with Claro? Isn't it less dense than American Walnut?

John,
Many are stocked with Claro. Maybe most, I dunno. But, there are many stocked in what looks like U.S. westcoast grown English walnut to me. Some also look like Black walnut to me.

I think the source of the wood may have been from the wood company in California, owned (started for the Parker Reproductions?) by the Mr. Skeuse. It seems we covered this subject with Richard Skeuse here and he provided some information on the wood source.