Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Hammer Guns

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 11-16-2011, 04:16 PM   #1
Member
10 bore
PGCA Member
 
scott kittredge's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,962
Thanks: 7,865
Thanked 2,657 Times in 856 Posts

Default

might be , a 2 frame str. grip weight 10 lbs 5 ozs , can't wait to shoot it. look out crows and duck oh and geese
scott kittredge is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2011, 04:40 PM   #2
Member
Roundsworth
PGCA Member
 
Mark Landskov's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,465
Thanks: 1,553
Thanked 577 Times in 319 Posts

Default

It is really a nice looking 'Lifter', Scott. Keep us posted. I am curious whether it was chambered for the '10A' or '10B'. That was the time frame when Parker was doing that.
__________________
GMC(SW)-USN, Retired
'Earnest Will'
'Desert Shield'
'Desert Storm'
'Southern Watch'
Mark Landskov is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2011, 05:49 PM   #3
Member
Hammer Fan
Forum Associate
 
Forrest Grilley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 120
Thanks: 43
Thanked 75 Times in 21 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Landskov View Post
It is really a nice looking 'Lifter', Scott. Keep us posted. I am curious whether it was chambered for the '10A' or '10B'. That was the time frame when Parker was doing that.
Were the "10A" and "10B" actually chambered differently? I thought the shell letters referred to thin and thick walled brass hulls, with the outside of the hull having the same dimensions. The thin walled hull had a larger inside diameter to accommodate 9 gauge card wads (.815) that would be fired in a 10 gauge with larger than .775 bore. My D hammer has .793 bores that I load thin walled brass with 9 gauge wads, it patterns remarkably well with this combination.

I could very well be mistaken about the difference between the "A" and "B" designations, if I am please correct me, this is a topic that I don't remember being discussed very often. I will have to go back and look this up in The Parker Story to refresh my memory.

Back to the main topic, you got yourself a beauty Scott, congratulations. I hope it brings you many years of good shooting.
Forrest Grilley is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2011, 08:41 PM   #4
Member
Roundsworth
PGCA Member
 
Mark Landskov's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,465
Thanks: 1,553
Thanked 577 Times in 319 Posts

Default

The '10A' brass shell has the same outside diameter as the modern paper hull. My 1879 Lifter has very little difference between the chamber diameter and bore diameter, due to the thin 'A' brass shell. The '10B' brass shell is smaller in outside diameter than the 'A' brass and paper hulls. I have dozens of brass shells in my collection. I will put together some photos to show the differences. Basically, the 'A' chamber will take W.R.A. Co. 10 gauge brass, E. Remington 10 gauge brass, UMC 10A brass, REM-UMC 10 brass and paper hulls (old and new). The 'B' chamber will only handle the '10B' brass shell. You are correct in regards to the wad sizes, Forrest. Manufacturers of reloading components carried wads in numerous sizes to accomodate different bores. My 1879 Lifter has '10A' chambers with bores of .808". A thin walled brass shell with 9 gauge wads would be perfect in my gun.
__________________
GMC(SW)-USN, Retired
'Earnest Will'
'Desert Shield'
'Desert Storm'
'Southern Watch'
Mark Landskov is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mark Landskov For Your Post:
Unread 11-17-2011, 07:06 AM   #5
Member
Hammer Fan
Forum Associate
 
Forrest Grilley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 120
Thanks: 43
Thanked 75 Times in 21 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Landskov View Post
The '10A' brass shell has the same outside diameter as the modern paper hull. My 1879 Lifter has very little difference between the chamber diameter and bore diameter, due to the thin 'A' brass shell. The '10B' brass shell is smaller in outside diameter than the 'A' brass and paper hulls. I have dozens of brass shells in my collection. I will put together some photos to show the differences. Basically, the 'A' chamber will take W.R.A. Co. 10 gauge brass, E. Remington 10 gauge brass, UMC 10A brass, REM-UMC 10 brass and paper hulls (old and new). The 'B' chamber will only handle the '10B' brass shell. You are correct in regards to the wad sizes, Forrest. Manufacturers of reloading components carried wads in numerous sizes to accomodate different bores. My 1879 Lifter has '10A' chambers with bores of .808". A thin walled brass shell with 9 gauge wads would be perfect in my gun.
Thank you for posting this information, this certainly clears things up. I would love to know what the dimensions are of a "B" hull, both inside and out. I've lathe turned a bunch of the "A" configured hulls for use in my gun, but have never examined a "B" hull to record the dimensions.
Forrest Grilley is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-23-2011, 12:57 PM   #6
Member
10 bore
PGCA Member
 
scott kittredge's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,962
Thanks: 7,865
Thanked 2,657 Times in 856 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Landskov View Post
It is really a nice looking 'Lifter', Scott. Keep us posted. I am curious whether it was chambered for the '10A' or '10B'. That was the time frame when Parker was doing that.
well the gun came in and it does take the "modern" 2 7/8 ths 10 ga shell but found a crack just behind the lock plates on both sides running for front to back about 1 3/4 in long, love the gun but not shur what to do. working on a dicount to help off set the cost of repair.(great people to work with). i will keep you posted. up date; worked out a deal ! now to get it fixed, thanks dave, scott
scott kittredge is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-24-2011, 02:55 PM   #7
Member
Roundsworth
PGCA Member
 
Mark Landskov's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,465
Thanks: 1,553
Thanked 577 Times in 319 Posts

Default

Scott, aside from the cracks, is the gun as nice as the pictures show? That was my 2nd choice to look at when I visited Puglisi's, but when Jason said it was spoken for, I did not bother.
__________________
GMC(SW)-USN, Retired
'Earnest Will'
'Desert Shield'
'Desert Storm'
'Southern Watch'
Mark Landskov is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-24-2011, 03:17 PM   #8
Member
10 bore
PGCA Member
 
scott kittredge's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,962
Thanks: 7,865
Thanked 2,657 Times in 856 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Landskov View Post
Scott, aside from the cracks, is the gun as nice as the pictures show? That was my 2nd choice to look at when I visited Puglisi's, but when Jason said it was spoken for, I did not bother.
hi Mark, yes!! nice , unturned screws lots of barrel finish ,30 to 40% case, points wright for me .just like a new pup you don't want to put it down thanks scott
scott kittredge is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to scott kittredge For Your Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.