Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions Shotgun Shell Reloading

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 08-19-2011, 07:10 AM   #1
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,935 Times in 795 Posts

Default

Bruce,

A barrel wall thickness of .008 was an accident waiting to happen! The British proof houses like .020" minimum in the forward portion of the barrels. I like .030" or more. Every collector of vintage guns should have access to a high quality barrel thickness gauge and use it! My Hosford Barrel Wall Thickness Gauge provides data as to what loads/shot size my guns should be safe to shoot. My Hosford gauge also saved one of our well know Parker guys from wasting $4000 on a 16 gauge Parker with thin barrel walls. After measuring he informed the seller and sent the gun back. The seller promptly relisted the gun with NO mention of thin barel walls. In fact, later we saw the gun on the seller's table at the UP shoot!

The gas jet does the cutting to weaken the wall. To be considered "plasma" the gas must be ionized by an electric charge. A charge MAY be induced during firing but I have no information to confirm this. Maybe if the gas jet were ionized a very clean cut would be evident on the bore side of a split in a barrel?

The gas jet may be more like a water jet cutter which uses high pressure water mixed with an abrasive substance to cut. Certainly any of the residuals from shooting that we regularly need to remove from our shotgun bores would serve as the abrasive.

This subject makes me appreciate the importance of a wad with a very good gas seal. Ballistics Products Inc. (BPI) sells a gas seal for 10 gauges called the X10X. Some loading data requires its use between the powder and the wad. When I select my loading data for BB size shot, I will opt for one that requires the X10X or similar high quality gas seal.

The wad design is likely the solution to the problems with shooting steel shot in doubles!

Mark
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-19-2011, 08:09 AM   #2
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,698 Times in 2,676 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Ouellette View Post
Bruce,

..........
The wad design is likely the solution to the problems with shooting steel shot in doubles!

Mark

Yes, and if Roster is correct, he solved that problem in 1987. The wad design plus mod or less chokes.

Looking forward to the verification / test findings. But there is always the Flat Earth Society.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.