Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-28-2011, 06:08 PM   #1
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,704 Times in 2,676 Posts

Default

We have found that Parker used different fluid steels which had different compositions. We have never seen evidence of Parker management just making up stories for marketing , so I have to believe Parker saw sufficient differences to believe that the steel was sufficiently different to warrant use in different grade guns. We have no evidence one fluid steel was more wear resistant, corrosion resistant, or the like than another. I suspect there are differences in tensile strength but I'm not aware of any tensile strength to destruction tests being done in order to compare fluid barrel steels. ( other than the damascus/fluid steel comparision tests in the DGJ)

We do know that all barrels , composite or fluid, were subjected to the same proof tests. We have reports from barrel refinishers that the higher grade fluid steel barrels are able to be more finely finished than lower grade barrels. I have personally seen that to be true.

The only document we have shedding light on barrel wear resistance is one from the PGCA depository in response to a C grade buyers question about which C barrel to select. Parker said that in order of wear resistance they recommended Acme, Bernard then damascus. That letter was published here by John Davis a couple years ago.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Unread 06-28-2011, 08:36 PM   #2
Member
Autumn Daze
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Suponski's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 4,394
Thanked 4,148 Times in 1,748 Posts

Default

We have found that Parker used different fluid steels which had different compositions. We have never seen evidence of Parker management just making up stories for marketing , so I have to believe Parker saw sufficient differences to believe that the steel was sufficiently different to warrant use in different grade guns. We have no evidence one fluid steel was more wear resistant, corrosion resistant, or the like than another. I suspect there are differences in tensile strength but I'm not aware of any tensile strength to destruction tests being done in order to compare fluid barrel steels. ( other than the damascus/fluid steel comparision tests in the DGJ)

Bruce, Could you give me references for this information? I would like to add it to my files. Thank You..
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker
Dave Suponski is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.