![]() |
Visit Mike Koneski's homepage! | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | |||||||
|
Quote:
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post: |
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
All this talk about 2.5" 16s on the for-sale thread reminded me, I still have a Belgian Browning auto loader. That only takes 2.5 also. I completely forgot I still had that gun because I recall my son saying he wanted it. Being a southpaw, I never liked shooting them.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post: |
|
|
#5 | |||||||
|
Quote:
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
I have so many 16's that unless I go to my files to check, I'd probably guess wrong. Let's just say at least 10 but maybe a tad over. For me it's' not the shell or it's payload, but the weight of the gun and its' handling qualities.
I sent a pristine CSMC RBL in 16 down the road because to me it was clunky. I also sold a Paker Trojan because it carried like a 12 to me and I just could not see myself ever picking it over some of my other guns to go hunting. I've also sold others; Foxes, LS Smiths, Masqueliers, Ithacas, Bakers for the same reasons. Right now, my favorite 16's are a 3-gun battery of Foxes, an XE with 26-inch barrels, another with 28-inch barrels and a 28/30 inch combo custom gun I had built for me and engraved by Geoffroy Gournet that is as nice or nicer than any of the CSMC Foxes ever built. They all get used and run from just under 6 pounds to about 6.5 pounds. They are pretty, but it is the handling qualities that make them useful to me. As far as availability of shells, all you need to do is get your wallet out and order up some RST's. Complaining is like owning a Bentley and whining about the price of gas.
__________________
"Somehow, the sound of a shotgun tends to cheer one up" -- Robert Ruark |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to roger mcmanimon For Your Post: |
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
Stan, the only thing I'm sure about lately is my name.
Took me a minute to find the gun, but it's marked 16/65 in an oval, which I take to mean 2.5". Double checking with the gauge, it measures 2.5" to the bottom of the rim recess. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post: |
|
|
#8 | ||||||
|
The only shells we could find were those “booger breaker” game loads and they were snotty! (See what just happened there?) Most guys wouldn’t think of shooting them out of a vintage double. They’d most likely be fine for hunting. A few shots over the course of a day. But I wouldn’t subject old stocks to that pounding in a round of clays.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#9 | |||||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Before we work on artificial intelligence why don't we work on natural stupidity |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Andrew Sacco For Your Post: |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|