Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions General Discussions about Other Fine Doubles

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
I've got my eye on a Churchill.
Unread 08-02-2025, 08:09 PM   #1
Member
Stepmac
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,358
Thanks: 0
Thanked 480 Times in 268 Posts

Default I've got my eye on a Churchill.

I'm looking hard at a Churchill. It's earlier than the famous XXV. Nice looking box lock. 30" tubes, cyl/cyl, steel. Price is on the edge of what I can afford. The gun is pretty much like new, but made in 1896. I sold my skeet gun (Remy Model 11, 20 gauge; and yes I weep when I think of it, my old friend.) I'm thinking that I could use cyl/cyl on the skeet range and it might help on the Clay range too. I could use some help (lots) there. I also think that I could push steel thru it which is nice. An old gun that I can shoot steel thru....that's a treat. Like many of us, I like to own and shoot classic shotguns. The trouble is I'm not a rich guy. I'm an average guy so I can't squeeze 5 or 6K for a shotgun. If I did I'd be single again.
Steve McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Steve McCarty For Your Post:
Unread 08-02-2025, 08:43 PM   #2
Member
bob lyons
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 431
Thanks: 945
Thanked 556 Times in 164 Posts

Default

Just my 2 cents I would never shoot steel out a side by side shot gun unless it had chrome lined barrels and open chokes.
I think they started doing chrome lined barrels in 70’s or 80’s but not positive.
bob lyons is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-03-2025, 08:58 AM   #3
Member
Ken Hill
PGCA Member
 
Ken Hill's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 797
Thanks: 1,082
Thanked 849 Times in 419 Posts

Default

Unless special ordered for 2 3/4” shells, the gun is probably a 2 1/2” chambered gun. Make sure you know the chamber length, is the gun in proof, and minimum wall thickness. Shooting standard American loads (steel or lead) may not be a good idea in an 1896 British gun.

Ken
Ken Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ken Hill For Your Post:
Unread 08-03-2025, 11:51 AM   #4
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,290
Thanks: 379
Thanked 4,329 Times in 1,403 Posts

Default

We could likely provide lots of information with a full size high resolution image of every mark on the barrel flats.
'made in 1896' and 'like new' highly suggests refinished, and there might be a date code when reproved.
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 08-03-2025, 02:20 PM   #5
Member
Stepmac
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,358
Thanks: 0
Thanked 480 Times in 268 Posts

Default

Thanks gents. If I buy this gun I'll not even consider shooting steel. I'm sure it's a 2.5 chambered gun. I haven't seen the gun, just looking at the pictures and it does look in fine condition.

I haven't been on a duck hunt in maybe five years. Then I was shooting a Browning Gold which was a very nice gun. Sold it in a moment of weakness. If a duck hunt looms I'll spring for a newish Ithaca Model 37. I'll set my antique doubles asside and shoot RST. For grins I might try RST bismuth. One box should last me a lifetime.
Steve McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-03-2025, 08:53 PM   #6
Member
Stepmac
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,358
Thanks: 0
Thanked 480 Times in 268 Posts

Default

I've decided to forego the Churchill. Think I'll buy a gun with modern steel barrel.
Steve McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-04-2025, 10:25 PM   #7
Member
Keith Doty
PGCA Member
 
Keith Doty's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 641
Thanks: 732
Thanked 837 Times in 339 Posts

Default

You don't have to go modern barrels for nontoxic. I went to bismuth years ago (5s for ducks), nearly like the lead 6s of days gone by and safe for fine guns. A treat after some years of shooting steel.
Keith Doty is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Keith Doty For Your Post:
Unread 08-21-2025, 11:52 PM   #8
Member
Stepmac
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,358
Thanks: 0
Thanked 480 Times in 268 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McCarty View Post
I've decided to forego the Churctehill. Think I'll buy a gun with modern steel barrel.
Late entry: I bought a Winchester Model 12 Light weight 12, made around 1958. Fixed full choke modern hard steel. Gun is minty. I wonder if I can shoot steel in this one. Should I have it open to Modified?
Steve McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-22-2025, 07:17 AM   #9
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,290
Thanks: 379
Thanked 4,329 Times in 1,403 Posts

Default

Winchester Proof Steel (AISI 4140 or possibly AISI 4340) was introduced in 1931 for the Model 21 and in 1932 for the Model 12.
I would use 6 or smaller steel. I wouldn't use large steel shot. Other opinions will vary.
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.