 |
|
 |
|
Notices |
Welcome to the new PGCA Forum! As well, since it
is new - please read the following:
This is a new forum - so you must REGISTER to this Forum before posting;
If you are not a PGCA Member, we do not allow posts selling, offering or brokering firearms and/or parts; and
You MUST REGISTER your REAL FIRST and LAST NAME as your login name.
To register:
Click here..................
If you are registered to the forum and keep getting logged
out: Please
Click Here...
Welcome & enjoy!
To read the Posts, Messages & Threads in the PGCA Forum, you must be REGISTERED and LOGGED INTO your account! To Register, as a New User please see the Registration Link Above. If you are registered, but not Logged In, please Log in with your account Username and Password found on this page to the top right.
|
 |
|
 |
05-20-2024, 11:53 AM
|
#1
|
Member
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 1,105
Thanks: 107
Thanked 1,570 Times in 582 Posts
|
|
I'm sorry but I don't see that resultant conclusion. It is very possible that the original article may have instigated the SAMMI bulletin, but there is nothing I see in the articles that seems to say that they were promoting the concept of short chambers to improve performance. His own experiment, which apparently the ammo companies didn's do, was pretty statistically inconclusive. My take away from the articles was that they warned against shooting long shells in short chambers, and the ammo companies made ammo to be safe in the existing chambers. All liability driven.
The short chamber issue was just something that worked itself out on the side of safety with shorter shotshells to always be safe in the chamber. The performance increase he predicted was relatively small with variation in data large over each 8 shots.
Plastic shot cup wads certainly made loading easier I would guess, but I am old enough and was interested enough to read a lot early in life to remember the press and advertising about shotgun shell performance accompanying the development and introduction. There is no doubt that the ammo companies had performance improvement in mind when developing shot cup wads. It was an order of magnitude more than the sketchy data he obtained and is obvious to any shooter who loads both ways.s
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Arthur Shaffer For Your Post:
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
05-20-2024, 12:04 PM
|
#2
|
Member
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,092
Thanks: 1,892
Thanked 5,506 Times in 1,535 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthur Shaffer
I'm sorry but I don't see that resultant conclusion. It is very possible that the original article may have instigated the SAMMI bulletin, but there is nothing I see in the articles that seems to say that they were promoting the concept of short chambers to improve performance. His own experiment, which apparently the ammo companies didn's do, was pretty statistically inconclusive. My take away from the articles was that they warned against shooting long shells in short chambers, and the ammo companies made ammo to be safe in the existing chambers. All liability driven.
The short chamber issue was just something that worked itself out on the side of safety with shorter shotshells to always be safe in the chamber. The performance increase he predicted was relatively small with variation in data large over each 8 shots.
Plastic shot cup wads certainly made loading easier I would guess, but I am old enough and was interested enough to read a lot early in life to remember the press and advertising about shotgun shell performance accompanying the development and introduction. There is no doubt that the ammo companies had performance improvement in mind when developing shot cup wads. It was an order of magnitude more than the sketchy data he obtained and is obvious to any shooter who loads both ways.s
|
Given the title of the articles I will have to agree to disagree on the point he was trying to make through examples and his mention of several gun makers who believed it made a difference and built their guns accordingly. The most important takeaway is why guns were made with short chambers.
__________________
Progress is the mortal enemy of the Outdoorsman.
|
|
|
|