![]()  | 
	
 
 
  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | ||||||
 
  | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Maybe, maybe not.  That is the name of the game.  Likely they can work, but the amount of work needed to get there is an unknown.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
	B. Dudley  | 
||||||
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
||||||
| The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | ||||||
 
  | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I assume that you’d have better luck with a Remington Parker correct?  I seem to see a lot of 12 gauge reproduction barrels around and every time I see a higher grade 1.5 frame with barrel issues it seems tempting.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
||||||
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
||||||
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | ||||||
 
  | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			The era of manufacture means little really.   
		
		
		
		
		
		
			I have seen barrels 50 serial numbers apart need tons of work to fit, and ones 10,000 numbers apart need little work. 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
	B. Dudley  | 
||||||
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
||||||
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | ||||||
 
  | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 | 
||||||
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Bob Jurewicz For Your Post: | 
| Hmmm | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | ||||||
 
  | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			With regards to the advertisement that Bob referenced, and likely a dumb question, weren't the weights stamped upon the barrels, or referenced in the records, actually "un-struck" weights, before the barrels were filed and ultimately carded/finished for fit prior to blueing? If so, shouldn't the barrels weigh somewhat less now that the barrels are out there looking for a new home? Pardon if I'm applying an LC Smith practice inappropriately to the Parker Gun. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Thanks, John  | 
||||||
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
||||||
| 
			
			 | 
		#8 | ||||||
 
  | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			No, you're right John - the barrels should definitely weigh less than the pre-struck weights stamped on the barrel flats of an original Parker.... Unless of course, one subscribes to the theory that the weight stamped was a post-struck weight and included the weight of the finished forend... which I do not. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			. 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
	"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.  | 
||||||
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
||||||
| 
			
			 | 
		#9 | ||||||
 
  | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			It said its a 2 barrel set, could it be this barrel was left heavy for balance?
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
||||||
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
||||||
| 
			
			 | 
		#10 | ||||||
 
  | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Yes, some two barrel sets were made with identical weight barrels.  Some were made with barrels of radically different weights.  The reasons were known only to the original owners.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
||||||
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |