Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Hammer Guns

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-19-2023, 03:53 PM   #1
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,952
Thanks: 38,663
Thanked 35,887 Times in 13,161 Posts

Default

Stan, the pin which extended up from the frame immediately above the lifting lever when opening the action was modified/inproved upon in late 1874 and early 1875.
The lever mechanism was changed so that the pin no longer extended up from the frame and the frame was changed and the pin hole in the frame may seem to have not been but this is because the new design was retrofitted to some guns.
In late 1874 or early 1875 the change in the bolt and bite design occured in order to better facilitate the bolt to seat more securely into the bite, hence the new tapered design.
Some guns had this new design retrofitted and we have seen a few of these guns where the hole in the top of the action has been plugged but most of these examples have the later tapered bolt/bite installed.
The earliest known example where there is no hole at all in the top of the frame is Parker No. 4239 but Parker No. 5395 has the hole but it is plugged.

Pages 95 - 98 of The Parker Story explain the changes in the lifter designs.

Above, ArtS gives an example of the modification retrofit to such a Parker.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 06-19-2023, 08:19 PM   #2
Member
ArtS
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 1,087
Thanks: 104
Thanked 1,544 Times in 572 Posts

Default

The one I mentioned (without going and checking) is 40xx. It definitely has the old style lifter (I tried a newer style and it wouldn't work) but the top hole is filled and barely visible in the metal surface. The old lifter works so it must have been shortened. That's why I think it was factory modified when assembled.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
Stan, the pin which extended up from the frame immediately above the lifting lever when opening the action was modified/inproved upon in late 1874 and early 1875.
The lever mechanism was changed so that the pin no longer extended up from the frame and the frame was changed and the pin hole in the frame may seem to have not been but this is because the new design was retrofitted to some guns.
In late 1874 or early 1875 the change in the bolt and bite design occured in order to better facilitate the bolt to seat more securely into the bite, hence the new tapered design.
Some guns had this new design retrofitted and we have seen a few of these guns where the hole in the top of the action has been plugged but most of these examples have the later tapered bolt/bite installed.
The earliest known example where there is no hole at all in the top of the frame is Parker No. 4239 but Parker No. 5395 has the hole but it is plugged.

Pages 95 - 98 of The Parker Story explain the changes in the lifter designs.

Above, ArtS gives an example of the modification retrofit to such a Parker.





.
Arthur Shaffer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Arthur Shaffer For Your Post:
Barrel Lug Frame Size Marking
Unread 06-20-2023, 12:18 AM   #3
Member
Stan Hoover
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Stan Hoover's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 2,775
Thanked 3,121 Times in 832 Posts

Default Barrel Lug Frame Size Marking

Thanks again Dean for pointing me in the right direction on learning more about the design changes on these Lifters.

So after reading some more this evening, I read ( In 1877, and perhaps earlier, Parker started marking the size of the gun’s frame on the bottom surface of the rear barrel lug.

Now it makes sense that there was no frame size on the barrel lug of the lifter that I’m looking to bring back to life, it is serial #5710 (1875), and the second set of barrels (late 1876) that I’m adding are marked as a 2 frame.

This would also make sense why the gun serial #3130 (1874) that Todd Allen was offering is also not stamped/marked with a frame size.

Stan
Stan Hoover is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Stan Hoover For Your Post:
Unread 06-23-2023, 12:24 PM   #4
Member
todd allen
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,219
Thanks: 2,179
Thanked 3,469 Times in 1,188 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan Hoover View Post

This would also make sense why the gun serial #3130 (1874) that Todd Allen was offering is also not stamped/marked with a frame size.

Stan
If you can get your hands on a Lifter from that era, I would love to see a report.
;-)
todd allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-23-2023, 12:29 PM   #5
Member
Stan Hoover
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Stan Hoover's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 2,775
Thanked 3,121 Times in 832 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by todd allen View Post
If you can get your hands on a Lifter from that era, I would love to see a report.
;-)
I've been taught that patience is a virtue, but, but, it sure is hard
Stan Hoover is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Stan Hoover For Your Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.