Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 05-11-2022, 10:23 PM   #21
Member
Jay Oliver
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Jay Oliver's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,178
Thanks: 1,477
Thanked 3,607 Times in 731 Posts

Default

I was just curious and trying to continue/improve my Parker education. Everyone's take on these two 410s makes sense to me. You just don't see these that often and this thread started by Steve gave me an opportunity to ask some Parker 410 questions I had been thinking about.
Jay Oliver is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jay Oliver For Your Post:
Unread 05-12-2022, 09:19 AM   #22
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,542
Thanks: 6,764
Thanked 9,891 Times in 5,253 Posts

Default

It is likely that any Parker .410 made before 1933, with 3" chambers, was probably drilled out to 3" at Parker Brothers. I say this because anyone would want the "new" 3" shell to play with and the makers would be the only source of a 3" .410 reamer at that time. I would not hesitate to regard an early Parker with 3" chambers as original or factory modified. An early 2 1/2" chamber Parker .410 is probably a rare bird.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Unread 05-12-2022, 11:30 AM   #23
Member
Jay Oliver
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Jay Oliver's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,178
Thanks: 1,477
Thanked 3,607 Times in 731 Posts

Default

Bill I hadn't thought of it like that. It makes sense that Parker would lengthen the chambers for customers' gun. There might not have been any other way to do it at the time. Very good point.

If one found a 2 1/2" gun would you keep that way?
Jay Oliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-12-2022, 12:18 PM   #24
Member
6pt-Sika
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
CraigThompson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 9,499
Thanks: 6,410
Thanked 9,016 Times in 3,961 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Oliver View Post
Bill I hadn't thought of it like that. It makes sense that Parker would lengthen the chambers for customers' gun. There might not have been any other way to do it at the time. Very good point.

If one found a 2 1/2" gun would you keep that way?
IF I ever got a Parker 410 I wouldn't ream it out . But I've got an IJ 410 Hercules with 3" chambers . Really anything I'd use a 410 for 2 1/2" has always been adequate for me be it dove , quail , skeet and what little bit of sporting I shoot with 410 .
__________________
Parker’s , 6.5mm’s , Mannlicher Schoenauer’s and my family in the Philippines !
CraigThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CraigThompson For Your Post:
Unread 05-12-2022, 04:49 PM   #25
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,542
Thanks: 6,764
Thanked 9,891 Times in 5,253 Posts

Default

I wouldn't trust any of these barrel butchers to work on any Parker. Choke and chamber butchers who specialize in this work are well documented as people we shouldn't trust with our guns. They are not full service gunsmiths.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-12-2022, 06:31 PM   #26
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,957
Thanks: 38,669
Thanked 35,901 Times in 13,165 Posts

Default

I've had Mike Orlen in Amherst, MA do choke work for me and they were done perfectly.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 05-12-2022, 07:01 PM   #27
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,887
Thanks: 1,847
Thanked 8,839 Times in 2,594 Posts

Default

When both of those guns were made, the 2 1/2-inch .410-bore shells carried a load of 3/8-ounce of shot.

Super-X .410 3-8 oz. 7 1-2 Chilled Shot.jpg

A few years after the 3-inch .410-bore shell was introduced our North American ammunition manufacturers upped the 2 1/2-inch .410-bore shell to the 1/2-ounce load we all know.
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post:
Unread 05-12-2022, 10:25 PM   #28
Member
Jay Oliver
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Jay Oliver's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,178
Thanks: 1,477
Thanked 3,607 Times in 731 Posts

Default

I probably should come clean...I found out about a 410 for sale privately a week or so ago. I saw it today and I could not pass it up. Not in the book, but made in 1927 still has 2 1/2" chambers(actually more like 2 7/16" as Edgar mentioned). 26" barrels M/F on a 000 frame 5 1/2 lbs. 14 1/4 LOP ball grip with splinter forend. Looks like it was tastefully refinished several years ago. I don't know what else to say other than I saw it and I just fell in love...
Jay Oliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-12-2022, 10:33 PM   #29
Member
Jay Oliver
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Jay Oliver's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,178
Thanks: 1,477
Thanked 3,607 Times in 731 Posts

Default

Dave I have seen on 410 Parker hang tags that they were tested/patterned with 3/8oz. of shot. Does it say on those boxes the powder charge in drams or the velocity?

There is a company called Sterling that makes 3/8oz 2 1/2" 410s @ 1329fps. That seemed a little fast to me
Jay Oliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-13-2022, 06:41 AM   #30
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,542
Thanks: 6,764
Thanked 9,891 Times in 5,253 Posts

Default

Congratulations, Jay.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.