Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions General Discussions about Other Fine Doubles

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 05-06-2022, 01:02 AM   #16
Member
Bernie Cross
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 40
Thanks: 48
Thanked 46 Times in 13 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan Hillis View Post
Maybe this willl be considered as being too picky but, cylinder bore at the muzzles is not "choke". "Choke" is another term for constriction and, the lack of constriction constitutes an absence of choke.

I understand, and realize, that there may seem to be a lack of accepted terminology to describe this condition. But, in the end, a gun that is cylinder bore at the muzzles has NO choke.
That is what I have always understood as the definition of cylinder bore. I’ve always taken cylinder bore as an indication that barrels may have been cut on older guns. More recently I have been told that some English guns were made with extremely open chokes for use in driven hunts and that cylinder bore was not really unusual.
Bernie Cross is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bernie Cross For Your Post:
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.