For comparison purposes only...

[Wild Skies]

Suppose you're having a conversation with a guy over a few beers about all things Parker and he says "Yeah but original Parker Bros. guns offer much better wood-to-metal fit than Parker Reproductions". You can say to him "Oh yeah, is that right? Take a look at these pictures."

The first pic below is a currently offered 16ga. Parker Bros. BHE that the seller describes as 100% new, not refinished, original, collector quality, etc. Look closely at the leading edge of the forend latch and take note of the wood-to-metal fit.

Now, for comparison purposes, take a look at the wood-to-metal fit of the forend latch of a 12ga. Parker Repro DHE that is also in 100% new and original condition.

I realize any craftsman building these guns can have a bad day and all Parker guns are not created equal. But, in terms of wood-to-metal fit, a Parker Reproduction doesn't necessarily have to take a back seat to an original.

Note: The above and below are for entertainment purposes only.

[Andy]

I'm going to bet the original is NOT all original and unaltered. But it reminds me of the folks who argue day in and day out that the Belgian A5's are vastly superior compared to the Japanese ones. I just don't think it's true, they may be more desirable not necessarily better made. That's a dandy Repro.

[6pt-Sika]

Originally Posted by Andrew Sacco

I'm going to bet the original is NOT all original and unaltered. But it reminds me of the folks who argue day in and day out that the Belgian A5's are vastly superior compared to the Japanese ones. I just don't think it's true, they may be more desirable not necessarily better made. That's a dandy Repro.

It’s all monetary to me . But I’m also old enough to remmember the older guys who were adamantly against ANYTHING made in Japan .

[B. Dudley]

I dont see much issue with the 16g. It could have been a chip out filled in with some gunk. Or who knows. As to original, there are a lot of claims made that nobody can truly back up, because they were not there.

If you want to make true comparisons to craftsmanship between Repros and original guns, lets talk about the checkering…

[Bob Jurewicz]

I have spent a lot of time looking at the pictures of that BHE 16. I can not convince my self it is original. I hope to be able to see it in person at the Southern if it is still available.
Bob Jurewicz

[Randy Roberts]

Originally Posted by Bob Jurewicz

I have spent a lot of time looking at the pictures of that BHE 16. I can not convince my self it is original. I hope to be able to see it in person at the Southern if it is still available.
Bob Jurewicz

Bob I am curious. What has caught your attention? Not looking to degrade the gun but you are an astute observer so you have my attention.

[Randy Roberts]

Originally Posted by Brian Dudley

If you want to make true comparisons to craftsmanship between Repros and original guns, lets talk about the checkering…

Brian would this be the norm in your opinion when comparing Repros to originals or just in this instance ?

[Reggie B]

I too have been reviewing that 16 for the several months it has been on the market. I need to have the gun in hand, I can’t convince myself that it’s not original nor can I convince myself that it is by the photos.

[Dean Romig]

Randy, that’s an example of the factory checkering on all DHE Repros. I can’t comment on the BHEs as I’ve never examoned one or even seen good pics of BHE checkering.





.

[B. Dudley]

Originally Posted by Randy G Roberts

Brian would this be the norm in your opinion when comparing Repros to originals or just in this instance ?

The norm on DHE repros. The checkering on all of them is horrible. An original Meriden Trojan is better executed than a DHE repro.

Now, BHE and A1 repros are very well done.