Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 09-19-2021, 04:57 AM   #1
Member
Mike Franzen
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Mike Franzen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,008
Thanks: 1,378
Thanked 4,689 Times in 1,418 Posts

Default

It’s an interesting discussion with good points on either side you agree with. I wasn’t there so I can not judge it from first hand experience. But I think trying new ideas is healthy. Nothing has ever grown or lasted without change.
Mike Franzen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mike Franzen For Your Post:
Visit Mike Franzen's homepage!
Unread 09-19-2021, 08:43 AM   #2
Member
Mike of the Mountain
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 6,184
Thanks: 19,500
Thanked 12,388 Times in 3,637 Posts

Default

Parker won with the format of top 5 vs top 5, the way it should be. Parker won with top 2 plus random 3 vs top 2 plus random 3 with a lesser format. I’d rather see it go back to the original format instead of having it more a “luck of the draw” process. And yes, I missed an unprecedented 5 targets, four of them being a lazy right to left crosser!! I felt bad for the Parker shooters who shot mid-40s in qualifying and were left out because it was deemed better to have a lucky draw instead of performance dictate the squads. That’s my two cents worth. I know there are plenty of shooters from both organizations who prefer the original format. Just sayin’.
Mike Koneski is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Mike Koneski's homepage!
Unread 09-19-2021, 08:58 AM   #3
Member
Mark Kircher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
MARK KIRCHER's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 472
Thanks: 1,592
Thanked 2,589 Times in 313 Posts

Default

Perhaps We should consider a format of just more shooters on each team.
Perhaps 10 or even 15 on each.
I watched the entire event and it took less than 45 minutes.
I agree with the competitive shooters that it should be best not random.
Having 10 or 15 shooters might solve the problem of more inclusion and the problem of the best against best that day.
__________________
“I never wrote a poem in my life. But if I ever do, it will be about ducks.”

– Gordon MacQuarrie, The Last Stories of the Old Duck Hunters, 1985
MARK KIRCHER is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MARK KIRCHER For Your Post:
Unread 09-19-2021, 09:07 AM   #4
Member
Mark Kircher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
MARK KIRCHER's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 472
Thanks: 1,592
Thanked 2,589 Times in 313 Posts

Default

Maybe even have 5 big bores for each team and 5 small bores for each team with total combined for winner.
__________________
“I never wrote a poem in my life. But if I ever do, it will be about ducks.”

– Gordon MacQuarrie, The Last Stories of the Old Duck Hunters, 1985
MARK KIRCHER is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MARK KIRCHER For Your Post:
Unread 09-19-2021, 11:32 AM   #5
Member
Mike of the Mountain
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 6,184
Thanks: 19,500
Thanked 12,388 Times in 3,637 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MARK KIRCHER View Post
Perhaps We should consider a format of just more shooters on each team.
Perhaps 10 or even 15 on each.
I watched the entire event and it took less than 45 minutes.
I agree with the competitive shooters that it should be best not random.
Having 10 or 15 shooters might solve the problem of more inclusion and the problem of the best against best that day.
Mark, with 10 shooters it took 45 minutes to an hour. Doubling that will just be a problem. Now you need two hours late day Friday (which I liked. Friday works better than Saturday) and most shooters and the range help have other things to do. This isn't the Smith-Parker where you have hundreds of qualifying rounds shot and there is a culture of participation among both groups.
Mike Koneski is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Mike Koneski's homepage!
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.