Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Hammer Guns

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 08-28-2009, 08:31 AM   #1
Member
Don Kaas
Forum Associate
 
Don Kaas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 560
Thanks: 0
Thanked 225 Times in 93 Posts

Default

This the gun that was at Cabela's Gonzales. I had it sent to my local Cabela's and examined it closely. I sent it back. "its fair share of issues" were far to many for me. The very worn engraving is one thing but those barrels are ruined IMHO. .090 is not "hefty" for a set of 120 year old 0 frame composite barrels. Good luck with it and be careful.

Last edited by Don Kaas; 08-28-2009 at 10:40 AM..
Don Kaas is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-28-2009, 09:22 AM   #2
Member
Double Trouble
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 289
Thanks: 57
Thanked 58 Times in 46 Posts

Default

Obviously, we mean 0.090" wall thickness (not 0.9")...

{If I had coffee already - I wouldn't have mentioned it.}
John Mazza is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-28-2009, 11:30 AM   #3
Member
Dollar Grade
PGCA Member
 
Kurt Densmore's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 315
Thanks: 1,374
Thanked 550 Times in 99 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mazza View Post
Obviously, we mean 0.090" wall thickness (not 0.9")...

{If I had coffee already - I wouldn't have mentioned it.}
Oppps...thanks John, I fixed it..
__________________
Shooter and collector of Parker Shotguns
Kurt Densmore is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-28-2009, 12:48 PM   #4
Member
Harry Collins
PGCA Member
 
Harry Collins's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,958
Thanks: 10,531
Thanked 1,864 Times in 762 Posts

Default

Kurt,

I have resorted to employment and am not at home to go measure the barrels. As I recall they are 28", but you have given me pause. Could they be 30"?

arry
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2005_1021Parker0009.JPG (77.8 KB, 34 views)
Harry Collins is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-28-2009, 01:25 PM   #5
Member
Autumn Daze
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Suponski's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,952
Thanks: 4,405
Thanked 4,169 Times in 1,753 Posts

Default

Harry,That looks to be one hell of a fun gun! What a great piece of wood.I have noticed that a lot of hammerguns have great wood on them.
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker
Dave Suponski is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-28-2009, 01:43 PM   #6
Member
Harry Collins
PGCA Member
 
Harry Collins's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,958
Thanks: 10,531
Thanked 1,864 Times in 762 Posts

Default

Dave,

Sorry to say the wood in not original. The stock was badly broken and before I knew of all the great repairs that were available I had Donnie Geems at Show Me Gun Stocks do a restock. I told him that it was a low grade Parker and not to get real fancy. He said he picked up a "scrap" from the floor. I think it is a nice "scrap" as well.

Thanks, Harry
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2005_1021Parker0011.JPG (83.9 KB, 29 views)
Harry Collins is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-28-2009, 02:52 PM   #7
Member
Autumn Daze
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Suponski's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,952
Thanks: 4,405
Thanked 4,169 Times in 1,753 Posts

Default

Harry,I have to agree that is one great piece of scrap! What kind of butt treatment is on the gun?
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker
Dave Suponski is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-28-2009, 11:18 AM   #8
Member
Dollar Grade
PGCA Member
 
Kurt Densmore's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 315
Thanks: 1,374
Thanked 550 Times in 99 Posts

Default

How would one know unless he was too measure the wall thickness on several 0 frame 16's that are still in proof..?? I did not have access to another parker but did have access to an English 16ga presumably in proof with its original 2 1/2" chambers and the barrel wall thickness at the end of the chambers was 0.85". I am not worried about this gun with normal 7/8 to 1oz loads with pressures comperable to that which were used in the day. You have a couple of 0 frame 16 hammer guns, when you get a chance measure the barrel wall thickness at the ends of the chambers and post up the information. By "heafty" I meant that the gun is 6 3/4 lbs which seems to me to be pretty heavy for a 26" bbl 0 frame 16. As far as that goes the barrels have more meat than most of the 0 frame 16 hammerless guns I have seen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Kaas View Post
This the gun that was at Cabela's Gonzales. I had it sent to my local Cabela's and examined it closely. I sent it back. "its fair share of issues" were far to many for me. The very worn engraving is one thing but those barrels are ruined IMHO. .090 is not "hefty" for a set of 120 year old 0 frame composite barrels. Good luck with it and be careful.
__________________
Shooter and collector of Parker Shotguns
Kurt Densmore is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.