|
01-26-2021, 04:35 PM | #3 | ||||||
|
I believe Craig Reynolds was documenting known 1/2 frames and his updated list appeared in Parker Pages about 2 years ago
That serial number looks a bit early for a 1/2 frame too Last edited by Mills Morrison; 01-26-2021 at 04:37 PM.. Reason: More info |
||||||
01-26-2021, 05:38 PM | #4 | ||||||
|
It's a 1 1/2 frame gun. Parker changed from a horizontal type entry to a vertical entry of serial numbers in the stock books starting in 1929. In this new style, the frame size is listed where it wasn't listed in the horizontal style stock books. There are a lot of 1/2 frame sizes listed, no 1 1/2 frames are found. These frame size were hand written until the last 2 stocks book # 81 & 82 when they used stamps instead of hand written frame sizes. In these last 2 books, frame size 1 1/2 is seen. I guess the guy was just too lazy to write 1 1/2.
|
||||||
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post: |
01-26-2021, 06:11 PM | #5 | ||||||
|
Okay, I'm confused Chuck.... are there really any 1/2 frame guns or are they all 1 1/2 frame guns with just the lazy guy's entry?
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
01-26-2021, 06:21 PM | #6 | ||||||
|
This IS supposed to be a 1-1/2 frame. The stock books for that time period had "1/2" hand written in as an abbreviation for 1-1/2. They eventually went to a Rubber hand stamp for "1-1/2".
I cover this extensively in my First written work on James Hayes prototype guns. in 2013. in both the DGJ and PP. The Parker Story incorrectly speculates that the prototype gun that I wrote about was a 1/2 frame gun and that is because of these notations in the stock books. It is a notion that is easily dismissed when looking at the actual gun and also all of the other surrounding entries in the stock books. It is interesting to see an "OG" research letter. Issued by Remington. I knew that they would do these on request. Figure 6 - 226709 Stock Book.jpg See here a scan from 1928 for 226709 and the 3 guns before it. Note the 1/2 frame size notation before the serial. That gun IS a 1-1/2 frame gun. This is the barrel lug. 101_0863.jpg
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
01-26-2021, 06:32 PM | #7 | ||||||
|
Lets try to be a bit more definitive - what is a "OG" research letter please?
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
01-26-2021, 06:35 PM | #8 | |||||||
|
Quote:
OG = Original Gangster. Meaning "Old School".
__________________
B. Dudley |
|||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
01-26-2021, 06:36 PM | #9 | ||||||
|
Sorry - you still lost me.....
Are you referring to a research letter you ordered from Remington? .
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
01-26-2021, 08:54 PM | #10 | ||||||
|
I am talking about the 1970s Remington research letter that started this thread.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|