![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
I don't own a Parker Reproduction but my only negative about the gun is the finish. Brian showed us what a good finish applied to a reproduction gun can look like.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post: |
|
|
#4 | |||||||
|
Quote:
But, let's play Devil's Advocate and take a look at the other side of the coin with an alternative opinion. I believe it goes without saying the durability of the Repro finish is superior to an oil finish. Get caught in a downpour two miles from the truck and you could be looking at a complete refinish of an oil finished stock. With a Repro you'll simply be looking for a towel to wipe it down -- the end results will be the finish will be as good as new. Take a look at the question and answer at the two paragraphs in the lower left column of an excerpt taken from a Stuart Williams interview with Jack Skeuse regarding the hi-gloss finish vs. an optional oil finish offered with Parker Reproductions.
__________________
Wild Skies Since 1951 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Greg Baehman For Your Post: |
|
|
#5 | |||||||
|
Quote:
That is why I usually choose to use Pro Custom oil on repros. It is very durable for a gun that will be used in the elements (though maybe not as much as a urethane). And the high build sprayed application more replicates the original look of the repros by way of finish build and sheen (pro custom can be left satin or rubbed up to near a gloss). I do this unless someone asks for a more traditional “at the wood” oil finish. But the key to maximizing figure is the use of a penetrating sealer as the ground coats. Vs the original urethanes just sit on the surface of the wood and obscure the figure. Here is another example of a Lefever B grade 16g that I am finishing up now. Someone thought it was a good idea to put a bowling alley urethane finish on it at one time. That crap was removed and a more traditional oil finish was used. (That is a factory Monte Carlo stock by the way). 9D779485-D906-4988-B0D3-65002B51944E.jpeg 340128C2-0E41-4F27-84A6-DFAE77D66E63.jpeg 73C387FE-A852-418E-8C3D-FC8125D38E51.jpeg
__________________
B. Dudley |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
|
|
#6 | |||||||
|
Quote:
I don’t have a rainy day gun. I subject all my working guns to the weather, regardless of the intensity. Hard rain will dull an oil finish but the sheen can be easily brought back. This is one big advantage to oil. I have a pre 64 model 70 that was custom stocked by Monte Kennedy using an oil finish. I used it in a couple of days of hard rain this year and the finish dulled a bit. A couple iterations of oil and wiping off fixed the issue. It’s as simple as that. My “oil” finish consists of tung oil filler iterations, followed by a mixture of turpentine boiled with alkanet root to color the stock if necessary. Then I finish by applying multiple coats of Tru Oil and wiping them down as I do to refresh a stock. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|