Curious your opinions on this VH

[B. Dudley]

Originally Posted by Gerald McPherson

Do full comb Parkers have thicker wrists?

Not really.

[Randy Roberts]

Originally Posted by Gerald McPherson

Do full comb Parkers have thicker wrists?

This one does. Quite noticeable when handling it.

[Dean Romig]

Originally Posted by Gerald McPherson

Do full comb Parkers have thicker wrists?

Not in the pre-Remington days.





.

[Dean Romig]

Wow Randy, that is unusually thick-wristed. What is the YOM?





.

[Randy Roberts]

Originally Posted by Dean Romig

Wow Randy, that is unusually thick-wristed. What is the YOM?

.

1928. Letter info attached.

[Rick Riddell]

Yeah the pics aren’t great, just trying to help spread some knowledge, as this a is a great site! I noticed in the pics the forend and stock don’t seem to match, I wondered if it was replaced.

[Dean Romig]

Randy, are there any Remington codes on the left barrel flat?





.

[Richard Flanders]

That is a thick wrist. Hard to believe the stock, or at least the stock finish is original on a gun with a receiver that weathered. Oops, I see those last pics are from a different gun. My comment holds for the first gun though; the butt looks too nice for the gun and, as stated above, it doesn't seem to match the forend.

[Jim DiSpagno]

Does that look like cysnide colors on the top tang area or just poor pic and Rich is right as to the fore end wood not matching butt

[B. Dudley]

In regards to the gun originally posted about... Without knowing the serial range of the gun, I would suspect that the buttstock was a later factory replacement and the forend is original to the gun.
The rounded bottom on the checkering pattern is later. Mid 1920s and on.