![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
may be they were thinking you could carry more shells in their pockets....and interesting thought you have bruce...we will probably never know why somebody wanted such heavy and large frame small bores....i dont know why but i would be first in line for a new parker 20 ga no 3 frame with 36 in barrels and 3 inch chambers...... charlie
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
I like my 8.8 lb. gun for flatland gamehunting.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Researcher, what is the story about Edwin Hedderly blowing up the DHE 20? I have not heard that story before. Hedderly's guns were bored for standard length shells and supposedly he shot normal length shell in them.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The frame vs weight legend |
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
Dave; John Truitt has it correctly expressed; frame size determines the weight between the hands, not the overall weight. I have an excel file showing this, but it does not fit the 19.5 kb limit.
With respect to the Parker catalog page shown in the last PP. It appears that the Parker catalog writers, and King's shop employees met only at the annual clambake, and then competed on opposing horseshoe teams. The table shows a 10 12 ga two barrel set gun with the 12 ga set up 6 oz lighter; it also shows a 7lb 1 oz 28 inch two frame 12 and a 7 lb 10 oz 28 inch one frame twelve, plus some 1 1/2 and 2 frame twelves lighter than 1 frame 16's. I'll try to find a way to post those tables. They show barrel swamp, not frame size, to determine gun weight, as John says. Best, Austin |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Austin W Hogan For Your Post: |
| Hedderly |
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
I think Kevin's brother was researching Hedderly in the 1990's, but never published the article. Hedderly was ahead of WW SuperX putting 8 gauge loads in 12's and 10 ga loads in 20's.
Best, Austin |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| Weight vs Frame Size |
|
|
#8 | ||||||
|
Dave ; I merged and printed the files, then scanned them for jpegs. The first shows two two barrel set guns; the 12 is 6 ounces lighter than the 10 on 56553; the upland barrel is much lighter on 73201; it makes up to a gun a half pound lighter than a 1 frame of the same barrel length. The difference in filing can be seen in the tabulated data.
The second shows two 1 1/2 frame twelves lighter than a 1 frame 16. The 6 lb 8 sixteen is a result of filing the swamp in the first four inches as the table shows. Best, Austin |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Austin W Hogan For Your Post: |
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
Who was Edwin Hudderly. I like a lot of drop but I have a long neck. Be easier to get my cheek bone on comb if I can manage that little task my shooting improves. ch
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#10 | ||||||
|
Because I find a lot of guns in the old records with great dimensions, and I find a lot of guns in the currant marketplace with extreme drops, I have a theory that a lot of those old guns with over 3 inch drop at heel kicked folks in the face so hard that they didn't get shot as much as the guns with less drop and hence more of them survive for us today. I have two high condition old hammer guns, a Parry and an Ithaca, and they both have drops in the 3 3/8 to 3 1/2 range. Of course then there is my own family situation where my Father's AE-Grade Remington Model 1894 wore a lace-on Monte Carlo for fifty years and got shot a lot.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|