|
 |
|
 |
| Notices |
Welcome to the new PGCA Forum! As well, since it
is new - please read the following:
This is a new forum - so you must REGISTER to this Forum before posting;
If you are not a PGCA Member, we do not allow posts selling, offering or brokering firearms and/or parts; and
You MUST REGISTER your REAL FIRST and LAST NAME as your login name.
To register:
Click here..................
If you are registered to the forum and keep getting logged
out: Please
Click Here...
Welcome & enjoy!
To read the Posts, Messages & Threads in the PGCA Forum, you must be REGISTERED and LOGGED INTO your account! To Register, as a New User please see the Registration Link Above. If you are registered, but not Logged In, please Log in with your account Username and Password found on this page to the top right.
Hi Unregistered,
On July 29th, this site will be moving..! No, really - it's "moving" to another physical location - including servers, gateways, routers - everything - including my coffee cup...
So, from the date of July 29th through July 30 or 31 (shooting for these dates, but - as always, I'm at the mercy of my ISP who has to install the lines to the new location - and we actually get them running ;) ). But - this site, cloud servers and main web will be OFF LINE.
Now, please save these dates!! Please - don't be "that guy" who emails me on the 30th to tell me you "can't open the Parker Website". I'll already know it is offline - and also know that you are "that guy"...
I'll take this notice up and down over the next week or so - and leave it up during the final few days before shutting it off on the 29th..
John D.
|
 |
03-07-2020, 09:17 PM
|
#1
|
Member
|
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,966
Thanks: 3,594
Thanked 14,516 Times in 3,778 Posts
|
|
I considered using a replacement dial indicator tip, which would have required milling a flat on the rod, sufficient such the the dimension from tip-to- back of rod was less than .550”. The whole reason for making the new rod was to measure 28 gauge barrels. Damn tips are more expensive than Harbor Freight dial indicators.
As John Hosford showed in his video, aligning the indicator tip, to the ball is delicate; more so, the smaller the inner tip.
Without question, a finer tip inside the ball will more accurately measure bore pits, however I didn’t anticipate doing barrel evaluations on guns for others, as much as I wanted something for my personal use. I really don’t buy so many guns, and of questionable pitting to offset the smooth needle characteristics given with the .500” diameter ball
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
03-07-2020, 09:31 PM
|
#2
|
Member
|
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 646
Thanks: 1,128
Thanked 736 Times in 255 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by edgarspencer
I considered using a replacement dial indicator tip, which would have required milling a flat on the rod, sufficient such the the dimension from tip-to- back of rod was less than .550”. The whole reason for making the new rod was to measure 28 gauge barrels. Damn tips are more expensive than Harbor Freight dial indicators.
As John Hosford showed in his video, aligning the indicator tip, to the ball is delicate; more so, the smaller the inner tip.
Without question, a finer tip inside the ball will more accurately measure bore pits, however I didn’t anticipate doing barrel evaluations on guns for others, as much as I wanted something for my personal use. I really don’t buy so many guns, and of questionable pitting to offset the smooth needle characteristics given with the .500” diameter ball
|
The tips would be the cheaper part of the endeavor b/c I'm thinking they would require modification to make them work (ie: the .55 dim you mentioned). It would take a little fine machining to make the working end of the gage work-out just right.
The tips in the photo are Starrett but that's only b/c I buy Starrett everything. There are cheaper alternatives through company's like Enco etc. Also, if one did want to stick with Starrett tips, they can be purchased individually.
|
|
|
|