![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
Websters Dictionary defines axial as somrthing that forms an axis
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
Why am I thinking of the phrase "blowing smoke"?
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Frank Srebro For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
Good will stops where dangerous..."smoke"...starts, and those numbers make no more sense that "axial shaft located in the receiver".
If they refer to the end of the chamber or just past the forcing cones, the 2 1/2" and 2 3/4" numbers are below the CIP recommended wall thickness for Category 1 “Standard Steel” (Non-alloy AISI 1045) with tensile strength = 101,526-123,137 psi. Are your numbers at 6"?? How many of the British boxlocks that you disassembled had wall thickness to match your numbers Craig?
__________________
http://sites.google.com/a/damascuskn...e.com/www/home Last edited by Drew Hause; 12-20-2018 at 11:35 AM.. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
Drew, the numbers that I express were measured 6" from the breech. I don't believe the conversation indicated any change, at least from my point of view.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
Guy's, let it go........Please
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Eric Eis For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
Capt. Picard will help:
. . |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to John Campbell For Your Post: |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|