Parker Barrels types and quality

[Researcher]

Jack O'Connor, Outdoor Life, 1942
A good many people resent being told that their much loved old guns were no longer safe. Just for the fun of it, Lou Smith (President of Ithaca Gun Co.) proofed (using 17,500 psi Proof Loads in 1942) a dozen or so damascus and twist beauties which were lying around the plant. Here's the dope: Most of the old timers busted loose with the first proof shell. The rest did with the second. Guns tried were cheap, medium priced and expensive: but all of them went. So if anyone wants to go ahead using modern smokeless stuff in a gun built for black powder, he can; but he can include me out.
Reviewing the findings Lou writes: "These birds who persist in using smokeless powder in twist and damascus barrels remind me of the guy who made a living by sticking his head in the lion's mouth at the circus. He got away with it for a long time; then one day he didn't!"

I guess those old Twist and Damascus barrels grew stronger with age. Certainly took Sherman Bell a lot more to blow them up!!

[Drew Hause]

A summary of Bell/Armbrust's attempt to blow up vintage pattern welded barrels using Remington Proof Loads of 18,560 psi is at the bottom here
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...hIiY62Hx4/edit
A total 28 vintage doubles/54 Twist and Damascus barrels + 2 Vulcan (Fluid) Steel were remarkably difficult to destroy.

[todd allen]

Originally Posted by Dave Noreen

I guess those old Twist and Damascus barrels grew stronger with age. Certainly took Sherman Bell a lot more to blow them up!!

Fluid steel propaganda.