Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Reproductions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 10-01-2010, 04:17 PM   #1
Member
charlie cleveland
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,811 Times in 3,973 Posts

Default

why not just shoot the 2 3/4 inch steel load lots cheaper and not hard on gun or pocket book.....charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-02-2010, 10:21 AM   #2
Member
Opening Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,905
Thanks: 11,203
Thanked 2,109 Times in 1,202 Posts

Default

Charlie is right, in Repo's (not original Parkers) with open chokes you can shoot steel. You need TM or Bismuth if you are going to original old Parkers.
Eric Eis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-02-2010, 12:56 PM   #3
Member
Feathersjr
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 52
Thanks: 170
Thanked 32 Times in 14 Posts

Default

Charlie and Eric:

I agree with both of you. BUT, I do not like steel. Admittedly they are making much better steel shot loads then several years ago, but I've seen to many ducks hit with steel still continue to fly off and you know they were going to die a short distance away. If you don't break a wing bone or get a neck or head shot they continue to fly. Losing a wounded bird, duck, or animal is painful for me and my experience with steel tells me it just doesn't have the same impact and killing power that lead, Bismuth, Hevi-shot, etc. has. I know it costs considerably more but so far I have been able to just "grin and bear it".

John
John R. Richards is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John R. Richards For Your Post:
Unread 10-02-2010, 04:16 PM   #4
Member
Opening Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,905
Thanks: 11,203
Thanked 2,109 Times in 1,202 Posts

Default

Agree with you on that John, I don't do much waterfowl hunting so I was looking at it from a cost point of view.
Eric Eis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-02-2010, 08:47 PM   #5
Member
Blind Dog
Forum Associate
 
Fred Preston's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 636
Thanks: 424
Thanked 399 Times in 193 Posts

Default

I agree, no steel or hard stuff in an old barrel and through no choke tighter than a nominal modified. I use "Black Cloud" 2&3/4", one ounce #3 in the gun pictured below (and recently posted as my grouse/woodcock gun) where notox is required such as certain public hunting lands in SD and waterfowl. The latter game is approached with my sneaky <12' canoe. The gun is a 1901 VH which I bought with barrells cut from 30" to <26". I burst the left barrel at the end of the forend (all fngers accounted for) with a 1&1/2 oz load (obstruction, honed too thin? I don't know) and Kirk Merrington sleeved in a new pair, nominally choked Sk in and Sk out; thus, steel is ok. I also stretched the shortened pull with a Galazan/Silvers pad; comb height is just right; balance point an inch behind the pin.

Clearly steel is not an effective substitute for lead, but maybe better than pebbles or rock salt.

Happy Hunting, Fred
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 9-10 MI G&W 002.jpg (2).jpg (205.0 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg rigged canoe 001.jpg (217.3 KB, 4 views)
Fred Preston is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fred Preston For Your Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.