 |
|
 |
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the new PGCA Forum! As well, since it
is new - please read the following:
This is a new forum - so you must REGISTER to this Forum before posting;
If you are not a PGCA Member, we do not allow posts selling, offering or brokering firearms and/or parts; and
You MUST REGISTER your REAL FIRST and LAST NAME as your login name.
To register:
Click here..................
If you are registered to the forum and keep getting logged
out: Please
Click Here...
Welcome & enjoy!
To read the Posts, Messages & Threads in the PGCA Forum, you must be REGISTERED and LOGGED INTO your account! To Register, as a New User please see the Registration Link Above. If you are registered, but not Logged In, please Log in with your account Username and Password found on this page to the top right.
|
01-19-2018, 10:44 AM
|
#1
|
Member
|
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 3
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Suponski
Shouldn’t that be 2 9/16” chamber?
|
That is what I thought also. So I questioned the research letter thinking it was a typo. I was told it was the first time he say a 2 7/16 in the book. And after looking some more found two more entered that way. Including the 16 gauge built just before mine.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
01-19-2018, 02:40 PM
|
#2
|
Member
|
Research Chairman PGCA Lifetime Member
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 1,289
Thanked 5,460 Times in 1,530 Posts
|
|
I don't ever remember seeing chamber lengths in 1/16" increments until Scott contacted me about a letter I did for him a few months ago. I looked at the stock book again and it sure looks like 2 7/16". Now the 7 could have possibly been a 9 but with the loop in the 9 not closed. Those old records are many times faded or the person who entered it just wasn't careful. The gun 1 S/N above Scott's gun had the same chamber length and was written exactly as Scott's gun, looked like 2 7/16". I decided to look at other pages in that stock book and found what looks like another 2 7/16" chamber. I looked farther and found an entry in which there is no doubt. Attached is the entry for Scott's gun and the other is the one which is clearly 2 7/16". I did find an entry listed as 2 1/2" in that book.
So why would Parker chamber for 2 7/16"? Why would Parker make it 1/16" shorter than 2 1/2" which according to The Parker Story as of May 1920 all guns 12ga. thru 32ga. had 2 1/2" chambers standard? Scott's gun was made in 1926. At some point in time later, Parker seemed to use 2 5/8" chambers as standard unless otherwise asked for.
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
|
|
|