John, you are right. I should not have challenged you in this forum. For this I apologize. But I read an article I bought and it refers to a subject on which I've devoted a great deal of time and personal interest. And if you are wrong on your facts in your article then you might be wrong on your conclusions.
You have published your article for the public...you should be open to a peer review. I would be willing to walk through with you off line re the specific questions I have about your article. Or, better yet since you have accused me of malfeasance (of reading your article), we can do it here in public. After all that's what book reviews are all about. In the end Reilly historians should welcome each other. I don't feel welcomed. Nor do I support everything you've written. (and a simple look at Reilly addresses on gun ribs will demonstrate what I'm talking about)
Let me know John...because I'll print here every error in your article. There's too much disinformation on the internet and your tone is not pleasant.
Last edited by Gene Williams; 12-23-2017 at 08:42 PM..
|
Threaded Mode