Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 05-09-2017, 12:51 PM   #1
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 34,088
Thanks: 41,415
Thanked 38,184 Times in 13,847 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garry L Gordon View Post
I just bought the GH in question above and a very early CE grade Fox (30 inch barrels, although not Damascus of course). It weighs 7 lbs. 11 oz. (no barrel weight markings -- too early for that I suspect).
It? The Parker GH or the Fox CE?

If the Parker GH, I would venture to say I can't remember ever seeing a GH, regardless of year made - or even a G hammer gun - that didn't have the pre-struck weight stamp. I suppose there may have been one or two that "slipped between the cracks" but it was the standard practice to stamp the pre-struck weight almost from the earliest days.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-09-2017, 01:11 PM   #2
Member
mobirdhunter
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Garry L Gordon's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,987
Thanks: 17,197
Thanked 13,561 Times in 4,074 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
It? The Parker GH or the Fox CE?

If the Parker GH I would venture to say I can't remember ever seeing a GH, regardless of year made - or even a G hammer gun - that didn't have the pre-struck weight stamp. I suppose there may have been one or two that "slipped between the cracks" but it was the standard practice to stamp the pre-struck weight almost from the earliest days.
.
Sorry, Dean. I guess I'm too linear. The Fox had no barrel weight marking. The GH is the one noted in the original post (with photo) along with its un-struck barrel weight. Forgive the confusion.
Garry L Gordon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Garry L Gordon For Your Post:
Unread 05-09-2017, 03:34 PM   #3
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,966
Thanks: 3,594
Thanked 14,516 Times in 3,778 Posts

Default

Something got me to thinking (no small feat lately) and I did an unscientific comparison of two similar 1 1/2 frame 12s. Both with skeleton butts, and same LOP.
A 30" DHE with bbls marked 3lbs 14 oz., actual weight 3lbs, 5.4 oz.
Receiver with fore end; 4lbs, 3.0oz., for a total assembled weight of 7lbs,8.4oz.

A 28" BHE, with bbls marked 3lbs, 12oz., Actual weight, 3 lbs, 0.0oz.
Receiver with fore end; 3lbs, 12.2oz., for a total assembled weight of 6lbs, 12.2oz

The 28" Barrels were 5.4 ounces less than the 30".

In the past I have found that, on average, 2" at the muzzle accounted for about 2-3 ounces of unstruck weight, so the BHE barrels apparently have had more striking done.

The BHE Receiver and fore end weighed 6.8oz. less than a nearly identical DHE.

The remainder of the difference in weight must be in both the boring out, (evidenced by the two plugs in the checkered butt) and the density of the stock.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.