Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 07-22-2010, 01:53 PM   #1
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,898
Thanks: 6,988
Thanked 10,337 Times in 5,455 Posts

Default

Although I have not done it, I think the best way to determine whether a gun is acceptable is to measure the wall thickness of a known original gun of the same gauge, weight, and frame size as the one being considered. The dimensions of the gun being considered shouldn't vary from the known original gun by very much at all. We haven't really discussed what the various wall thicknesses are for Parker composite barrelled guns as they come from the factory. Only when we know what Parker Brothers thought was safe for lightweight composite barrelled gun can we establish a base figure to post on our site.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Unread 07-22-2010, 02:18 PM   #2
Member
Bob Jurewicz
PGCA Member
 
Bob Jurewicz's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,611
Thanks: 2,006
Thanked 2,566 Times in 668 Posts

Default

The gun in question is a very nice one except the barrels have been honed and reblacked.
Right barrel MWT is .027". Left MWT is .022" for about 10 inches rear of choking.
I don't think this is a shooter!!
Bob Jurewicz
Bob Jurewicz is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-22-2010, 03:53 PM   #3
Member
Opening Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,905
Thanks: 11,203
Thanked 2,109 Times in 1,202 Posts

Default

Bob how nice is nice..... And what gauge is it? If it was a 12 well maybe if it was a 20 I would probably pass or put tubes in it.
Eric Eis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Eric Eis For Your Post:
Unread 07-22-2010, 02:27 PM   #4
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 33,332
Thanks: 39,706
Thanked 36,693 Times in 13,397 Posts

Default

Ray, speaking in generalities, as the gauge goes up the internal pressures exerted on the barrel walls go down - the smaller the gauge, the higher the pressures and vice-versa.

This theory is based on the load used.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 07-22-2010, 07:44 PM   #5
Member
Ray Masciarella
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 472
Thanks: 346
Thanked 438 Times in 110 Posts

Default

Thanks, Dean. I have a 10 ga with pitted bores. They are about .032 and.042. (I think, tho one guy measured them at .043 and.045) Have thought about cleaning them up but have hesitated. A couple of pits are pretty deep. Do you think this could cause a rupture? Ray
Ray Masciarella is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ray Masciarella For Your Post:
Unread 07-22-2010, 10:27 PM   #6
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 33,332
Thanks: 39,706
Thanked 36,693 Times in 13,397 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Masciarella View Post
Thanks, Dean. I have a 10 ga with pitted bores. They are about .032 and.042. (I think, tho one guy measured them at .043 and.045) Have thought about cleaning them up but have hesitated. A couple of pits are pretty deep. Do you think this could cause a rupture? Ray
Ray, simple pits, even pits we might think of as "deep" don't generally contribute to ruptures unless combined with other serious barrel issues such as being below accepted safe minimum wall thickness or improperly repaired dents, etc. I have Damascus guns with considerable pitting in the bores which I shoot without trepidation because I know the barrel walls, from one end of the barrels to the other, are quite sufficiently thick and sound.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 07-22-2010, 10:30 PM   #7
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 33,332
Thanks: 39,706
Thanked 36,693 Times in 13,397 Posts

Default

Bill, on a 6-frame 10 bore I would have guessed thicker.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-23-2010, 02:23 PM   #8
Member
Ray Masciarella
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 472
Thanks: 346
Thanked 438 Times in 110 Posts

Default

Thanks again, Dean. I'm gonna shoot it this weekend for the frist time. If you don't hear from me again, you know what happened!
Ray Masciarella is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.