California's New CC Ruling

[Setter Man]

Originally Posted by Robin Lewis

I read the original Bill of Rights and I easily see a common thread in all of them, which I believe Russell tried to shine a light on when he listed them. That common thread is that each, and everyone of these amendments, is directed at the individual and are rights reserved for them alone. Not rights reserved for a Militia or church or town or army or .... whatever, just for the individual alone,.... the people.

It seems unreasonable to argue that the second amendment alone is not dedicated to the rights of the individual.

So you don't believe constitutional rights should be extended to entities (religious institutions, non-profit entities, schools or corporations)?

[Bindlestiff]

Originally Posted by Jay Gardner

So you don't believe constitutional rights should be extended to entities (religious institutions, non-profit entities, schools or corporations)?

Yep, I do. These rights are extended to all the "people" that make up the religious institutions, non-profit entities, schools or corporations thereby the organizations have these same rights. Take away the people and they lose these rights.