![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
I tested a case of the 7/8 20 ga Rio against RST. I found the Rio burnt very clean but at 1250 vs 1125 had noticeably more kick. An old engineering calculation is Energy= 1/2 Mass x Velocity squared. That puts the Rio 23.4% higher in energy. That may not directly correlate to kick but I could feel the difference. I am sticking with RST.
David |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to David Dwyer For Your Post: |
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
Pretty hot load. I used to shoot them but stopped two years ago.
Did not see the data but someone told me PSI over 10,000. I don't know if it is true or not. But having used Rios for years in my Parkers they would all get loose over time. Now after having switched to RST I have not had a single one get loose or have any issues. Just my observations. BTW: the RST shells break the clays just as hard if not better and at any distance. For my Parkers RST is the only shell I want to use if I have my choice. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to John Truitt For Your Post: |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|