Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 11-29-2015, 06:24 PM   #1
Member
Big D
PGCA Member
 
John Dallas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,543
Thanks: 512
Thanked 4,030 Times in 1,705 Posts

Default

Boy, I'd sure like to see the "science" behind this piece of legislation.
__________________
"Striving to become the man my dog thinks I am"
John Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to John Dallas For Your Post:
The Science Behind Banning Lead Shot
Unread 12-02-2015, 03:41 PM   #2
Member
Patrick Butler
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 164
Thanks: 134
Thanked 147 Times in 46 Posts

Default The Science Behind Banning Lead Shot

First, I own a modest (by the standards of this group) collection of SXS, the vast majority are Parkers and none can shoot steel. I do more skeet than hunting nowadays but cussed when lead was banned for waterfowl in 1991 and when California set the rules banning all lead in 2017.

However, at the risk of bringing down the wrath of my fellow members, I must admit that, as big as a pain in the behind the new laws are to those of us who shoot vintage guns, I can see the point.

First, lead is toxic and the shot quickly gets into the system, especially in the areas of concentrated hunting (clubs and public waterfowl areas) via the raptors and many mammals who feed off of the wounded birds. Upland game hunters loose birds, even with the best of dogs. Also, many hunters will take long shots and wound birds, like it or not. A hunting license does not require an IQ test.

I saw many raptors circling the local pheasant hunting areas recently, feeding on lost birds. I like watching raptors and have really enjoyed the come-back of the Falcons and other species that occurred after DDT was banned. I also remember back when Red-Tailed Hawks were called "chicken hawks" and frequently shot at in the countryside.

There are, albeit very expensive (especially for those who do not reload) alternatives to lead. At the prices, you might think RST was substituting gold for lead...The flip side is that we use very few shells when hunting most upland game other than doves. The expense is usually minimal in contrast to that of that Parker in your hands, your dog, and all of that gear.

I Goggled up the subject and here was the first of thousands of hits-it summarizes hundreds of studies and lists, a few pages down, over 150 wild animals that are poisoned by lead shot:

https://www.peregrinefund.org/subsit...7%20Tranel.pdf

I doubt that many will agree with me, but I have come to believe that for hunting areas it makes sense to get the lead out-as we did with toothpaste tubes and tetraethyl lead in gasoline.

Respectfully,
Patrick

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Dallas View Post
Boy, I'd sure like to see the "science" behind this piece of legislation.
Patrick Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Patrick Butler For Your Post:
Reply

Tags
gh damascus, pheasant hunting, rst

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.