![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
Agreed. I think there was a period of time, perhaps turmoil, where they were not sure what they were going to change or keep. In my upcoming article on the Remington guns, you will see my position is that they told management that they were going to NOT lose money on the Parker operation, nothing would be thrown away and nothing new would be started until they had to.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to George M. Purtill For Your Post: |
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
This is a very good thread that Ralph English started in 2012. I ran into it in the course of my Remington research.
The interesting thing for me is that NONE of these guns are Remington guns per se. Remington guns are thought to be 236531 and onwards. All of these so called transitional guns are before that. However, what we have or at least I have learned is that there are no bright lines in Remington or Parker production. Dates and serial numbers are estimates only. There is a lot of room on each side. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to George M. Purtill For Your Post: |
|
|
#5 | |||||||
|
Quote:
I would suggest that these particular guns may have been those that had been started before the purchase/sale of the 'Parker Gun works' as part of the inventory of machinery, tools, parts, completed guns and uncompleted guns, and finished after Remington Arms ownership. Notice that the butt plate on 236199 has the correct spur too. . |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|