Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 01-23-2015, 12:56 PM   #1
Member
Kensal Rise
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,774
Thanks: 636
Thanked 2,598 Times in 931 Posts

Default

Another rationale/benefit of the insert approach was production speed. It took a lot less time to fit up a bite with this system. And time is money when you're making products. The replaceable bite also made later servicing the system faster... and cheaper.

The major culprits in bite/locking bolt interface degradation are poor lubrication of the surfaces, improper cleaning, and heavily loaded cartridges. Just to name a few.
John Campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-23-2015, 01:10 PM   #2
Member
Autumn Daze
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Suponski's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 4,394
Thanked 4,149 Times in 1,749 Posts

Default

The bolt design from the introduction of the hammer less gun in 1888 featured a 12 1/2 degree angle for locking. This did not change over the course of production. The design changes with the replaceable bite and later the stepped bite were to allow the parts to be fitted and repaired faster.
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker
Dave Suponski is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.